I’ve got a green one too - has been on my 14 PM since I got it at launch. It’s wearing/patina-ing, but it’s still in good shape. I haven’t experienced the quality issues others have, it seems.

Yup. A decade ago. When map packs set you back $15 each and made the total cost to actually get all the content $120. And there were still loot boxes starting at BlOps2 on top of that. Now you get (in the case of MW2) two years of support, maps, guns, etc. for $70 and if you want cosmetic bullshit, you can buy it (and know what you’re buying when you do - no loot boxes) but it’s still all cosmetic. And let’s be honest - most of those free cosmetics that you could unlock were crap anyway. One more variation on the dozens of camos already available.

Cosmetics, sure - like always. They’re entirely optional. So are the Battle Passes. Everything of substance - all weapons and maps - are still included in the base price. I don’t understand people raising a fuss about that sort of thing.

Maybe it’s more campy at lower skill levels? I honestly haven’t seen much of it (outside of Santa Seña - that map is a dumpster fire and I have experienced shotgun corner campers there) - between constant UAVs and drill charges, camping is basically a death sentence.

MW19 was ridiculously campy and there wasn’t much you could do about it. Backlot, Suldal Harbor, Piccadilly…too many rooms with one way in (and that way in has a door) and claymores everywhere.

Like I said, to each their own, but it’s one of the better CoDs we’ve had in a while.

Meh. To each their own. It’s a lot bigger at launch than MW19 was. Gameplay is less campy because of what they’ve done with perks. And with two years of support it’s going to be the best value for $70 we’ve ever seen in a CoD game.

You do you, but MW2 is great.

You understand this is the preseason, right? And that in two weeks there will be the full progression system that’s been in every CoD since MW19.

And a better chip. And screen.