Nah, this is a super ambiguous example that even humans don't agree on. Maybe try something like "buffalo buffalo buffalo" :) or some word like "the tortoise leapfrogged the hare" what animals were involved in the race? Should be 2 and not 3.

Doesn't mean specialized ners aren't better tho, just that this white man example ain't a good test.

The x and y should be flipped in my opinion. Spending is independent and life expectancy is the result... But I guess this way says that despite having a low life expectancy we can spend a lot more to try to improve some third thing that isn't shown, like quality of life or my doctor's golf clubs.