Electronic_Source_70

Electronic_Source_70 t1_j9iw65f wrote

The problem with this is that unless they work in Google or Amazon, it's hard to know because all the advance and powerful models' info haven't been sent to the public or info is known. Also do they work in computer vision, ML or LLMs or other deep learning fields and are the AI engineers actual ones with credibility or are they SE that watch George hotz or something because I don't believe you unless your related field is neuroscience if that's the case I will shut up and hid in the corner.

5

Electronic_Source_70 t1_j0wn72v wrote

Let me preface this by saying we don't know what web3 is yet until a couple of years where most have changed their infrastructure from the current web to the new one, and it's widely used and worked on this can take 2 years maybe 10. If it's this decentralized web, then sure, but looking at how it works, I doubt this will be it also by 2.5. I just mean a modified version of web 2, which is more secure

1

Electronic_Source_70 t1_j0wjmfh wrote

Who coined this new block chain system as web 3, and who are they to be able to do this? Also, blockchain is not an infrastructure that will save the world or at all innovative. I don't agree with this system to be web 3 unless the USA government or companies with huge amounts of influence on the internet are calling it that(crypto companies are not at all credible). From what I am concerned about, this is at most web 2.5. Also, putting AI nonchalantly in this system when you have no idea how it will be implemented and just making it up to sound like a real world JARVIS makes this sound more of a scam. From what I'm concerned Web 3 will not be a thing unless the whole internet infrastructure is changed, not adding blockchain like if it was some kind of magic spell

1