LAION is a reputable group and they care about ensuring that OpenAI doesn't achieve its goal of banning open source AI.

The article also says that the Italian agency is mad that OpenAI isn't collecting a lot more private data to determine the age of users.

If you read the article, its about user account data and not the training data.

Or at least arming the groups who fight against the Taliban and not letting the Taliban hide behind Pakistan's borders.

How the fuck was she allowed to keep adopting cats for so long?

You joke, but I could see governments trying to pressure Adobe into adding AI to Photoshop that constantly scan what you are making in order to try and block things they don't like.

I recall that Giselle Maxwell or Epstein also sent a severed animal head to someone's doorstep for standing up to them.

> There's also the issue that in this case internet archive had moved away from distributing copyrighted material on a strict 1:1 basis with a corresponding physical copy so this particular case was more complex than the lending of personal property.

The judge ruled that this was irrelevant though, which was really stupid. Buying 1 copy should mean that you have one copy to lend out through physical or digital means. It shouldn't matter what form it was in when you bought it.

We should be making 3D models of these historic sites along with museum items, so that they can be preserved in spite of damage to the physical object or place.

Human brains contain a lot of neurons for life support, connective wiring, maintenance, and other stuff that a digital brain wouldn't require. Human brains have also been structurally optimized by evolution, and are distilled via synaptic pruning.

USB sticks with pyrotechnics have been a thing for years: https://hackaday.com/2018/01/19/this-usb-drive-will-self-destruct-after-ruining-your-computer/

I wish the article described what sort of wounds the reporter got, because for all we know it could have been a just a scratch. I can't imagine that a non government entity can find explosives powerful enough to do serious damage when hidden in a USB stick.

The groups like Exodus Cry who were going after them in those lawsuits were also really controversial, yet reporters often didn't verify the source. They trusted comments from sexist hate groups like 'National Center on Sexual Exploitation' purely because of the name.

There's Canadian government funded porn as well, and the Canadian government wants more Canadian porn under their new proposed CanCon rules.

They can claim whatever they like, but it shouldn't be taken seriously if they hide the important details behind fake excuses of "safety". From the paper:

> Given both the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4, this report contains no further details about the architecture (including model size), hardware, training compute, dataset construction, training method, or similar.

Human brains have structural components / shapes that likely help them learn languages easier:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernicke%27s_area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broca%27s_area

Human brains also start off with way more parameters than needed, and language is most effectively learned before the synaptic pruning reduces the number of parameters.

> Ethyl acetate Ethyl acetate2.svg nail polish remover, model paint, model airplane glue

lol

With unlimited money, I would use a sphere of high quality cameras on a metal rig to capture them at a specific instance in time. Then I'd use photogrammetry to stitch the images together.

It should excite people that the technology is still very much democratic in terms of costs, and not something only the 0.1% can afford.

It still costs time and money to label your own dataset. This chart appears to be using an older pre-made dataset that's rather limited compared to more recent text to image datasets like LAION.

> We Some humans have critical thinking, and we can question if what they we know is fact or false.

I fixed that for you

The issue with laws attempting to deal with this issue, is that they they will likely be written vague enough to harm the art community, and they will place the onus on companies to damage their models instead of targeting the people who do use the models for harm.

If Getty Images wins, then AI generation tools are going to become further concentrated to a handful of companies while also becoming less open.

TIL apparently sharks can often be found nearby groups of dolphins. It makes a ton of sense though.

> This myth is often associated with a shark safety tip: “If you see dolphins, it's safe to swim there because their presence scares away sharks.” This is simply not correct. In fact, sharks and dolphins are often found near each other for a simple reason—they eat the same food, and both go where the food is.

https://slate.com/technology/2014/05/adam-walker-saved-by-dolphins-from-shark-attack-the-myth-that-dolphins-protect-people.html

But the older UK voters are still going to keep reelecting them until they die out.