She needs therapy

Its interesting that Google Colab also had a similar issue recently where they accidentally banned a ton of users. I wonder what's happening on the backend that's causing these issues?

Honestly I'd prefer they target the bot accounts trying to scam people in the comments instead of sex workers

> lol just how many different ways do u need to change the yardsticks.

> this is the absurd quality of reddit discussions

Absurdity? You literally implied that Singapore should just brutally slaughter everyone in government.

I said that Singapore was behind a good portion of the world on the issue of making same-sex sexual activity legal, after you tried to use it as example of Singapore's system working effectively.

> Singapore just repealed buttsex law because of increased pressure from citizens.

Well we should consider welcoming them to the 21st century then for doing the bare minimum at a snail's pace.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Europe

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_the_Americas

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Asia

> Even in a dictatorship/monarchy, citizens can change things if they are really motivated. Ever heard of the French Revolution.

The French Revolution involved purging society of royalty and those supporting it. Singapore isn't going to do that anytime soon.

Its crazy to see people cheering for Disneyland with a Death Penalty

Singapore is a civilian dictatorship though, so its not like the citizens have a chance at influencing the leadership's opinion on the death penalty.

> Other groups have called for an effective ban on online pornography. Anti-porn group Collective Shout called for all pornography to be treated under the same classification as child sexual abuse material or terrorism material, which would be required to be removed or blocked in Australia.

Its no surprise that the groups pushing for this massive privacy invasion are batshit insane.

Some of these ex intelligence officers are using their skills to attack citizens of the US and its allies. For example: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-spying-raven/

> he had joined Project Raven, a clandestine team that included more than a dozen former U.S. intelligence operatives recruited to help the United Arab Emirates engage in surveillance of other governments, militants and human rights activists critical of the monarchy.

> Stroud and her team, working from a converted mansion in Abu Dhabi known internally as “the Villa,” would use methods learned from a decade in the U.S intelligence community to help the UAE hack into the phones and computers of its enemies.

> “I am working for a foreign intelligence agency who is targeting U.S. persons,” she told Reuters. “I am officially the bad kind of spy.”

> OnlyFans is not alone in taking steps to address online safety. The government's long-delayed online safety bill proposes heavy fines for websites failing to protect children.

This news article is promoting the absolutely horrendous clusterfuck that is the "Online Safety"

> The NSPCC said neither the current regulation nor the planned legislation go far enough.

And these idiots want the legislation to be made even worse.

Their engineers didn't come up with a rocket design that could operate in the dark, and they got upset at NASA for it. PR-wise they have a lot of work to do lol

Probably goes a bit faster than that when nosediving into the ground

That can be solved up until a certain point by submerging everyone in liquid and forcing them to breath liquid oxygen. We'll also have to inject liquid into their body cavities as well.

https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/5635/max-g-survivable-suspended-in-water

> Granted, crashing full speed into a vertical granite cliff might exceed those specs, but that's an edge case and we'll put it in the training docs that doing so is ill-advised.

We should setup a remote control passenger plane filled with crash test dummies to test this, to see if it does exceed the limits of the black box.

> so don't elect morons.

If it only it were that simple and easy lol

Congress already has completely uneducated people like Anna Eshoo leading the charge on terrible ideas about AI. So, clearly he and rational experts have less control than most people thing.

Its politics, so I'm going to say probably no. Especially with that idiot Congresswoman Anna Eshoo attacking open source AI research, and yet somehow she on the congressional AI group.

I'm wonder what sort of legislation and regulation he helped pass? I imagine that most large industries have people like that in governments.

The EU is being targeted by Ashton Kutcher and his Thorn organization because of its status as a global regulator. So, you aren't safe from this bullshit if you live outside the EU.

https://netzpolitik.org/2022/dude-wheres-my-privacy-how-a-hollywood-star-lobbies-the-eu-for-more-surveillance/

Kaggle's free tier seems to give more GPU time than Colab Pro right now

I wonder if you could slowly replace a living person's brain with newly grown cells to combat aging with this idea?

They are still being used to correct faces and other issues with diffusion model outputs

This is also one of the reasons why police cannot be trusted with encryption backdoors either.

Its certainly harder to trust closed source implementations can do what they claim to do

Even with Colab Pro, you are going to run out of GPU time really quickly. Kaggle's free tier for example gives you more GPU time than Colab Pro does at the moment.