EqualityZucchini

EqualityZucchini t1_je0k4cc wrote

If anyone is curious about the US, we are on average ~30:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/motherhood-deferred-us-median-age-giving-birth-hits-30-rcna27827

Up from 27 not that long ago:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db232.htm

Like in Europe there are big gaps between areas (this is outdated but the geo-patterns are still probably relevant):

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/04/upshot/up-birth-age-gap.html

I always find things like this fascinating... I was exactly the average age of a first-time mother in my county, when I had my first child.

12

EqualityZucchini t1_jdbfm2x wrote

Bro I'm not angry but people over 40 know what TikTok is.

You remind me of those people in 2010 who claimed people over 30 couldn't use a smartphone. Or the same in 2000 for the Internet.

I'm.sure there are some slow learners out there but it's not like cloud computing or something. Most people know what TikTok is.

My mom is pushing 70. She knows what TikTok is.

21

EqualityZucchini t1_jbr1fmo wrote

I feel the title is a bit baity. Sure, dates add nothing to a culture when they obscure or de-prioritize the content that doesn't have dates. But they aren't suggesting that dates have no value to history at all, just that their history, which is largely undated, should not be lost to their culture.

And it's a valid point: the idea of "everywhen" fits nicely into a relativistic view of time as a dimension. We may not know where it lies, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

A linear sense of history based on dates will leave out dateless knowledge.

A good chunk of my cultural history is undated and lost to time, including European cultural history and women's history. It's great that some people have been keeping time on what they consider to be important, but we lose a massive amount of information when we only accept dated events as history.

22