Excellent_Fig3662

Excellent_Fig3662 t1_j3mr0xv wrote

Sure, but you’re still engaged in science fiction as an escapism from the real world. The more important question you should be asking yourself is why your psychology is drawn to this? That’s all I have to say.

1

Excellent_Fig3662 t1_j3mg0wg wrote

What dumb science fiction are you throwing around like reality? An army of clones? 😂dude you’ve watched way too many Disney movies. Our existential threat is the proliferation of weapons, specifically weapons of mass destruction, in the hands of immature and violent humans. There are very successful social systems in the world that eliminate human suffering and level out inequality; see Rutger Bregman, Utopia for Realists.

2

Excellent_Fig3662 t1_j3jvtpi wrote

Just about to the end, it was really more than I could suffer. It’s very unserious, but the author is intelligent and has a good mind. He should try reading sociology.

1

Excellent_Fig3662 t1_j3j9o6f wrote

Let me simplify. The biggest problem we face is not from sensationalized computers but human psychology sabotaging our species, more specifically, individuals in power using weapons of mass destruction.

1

Excellent_Fig3662 t1_j3hxzob wrote

What you science fiction here already exists in reality through inequality. Well nourished and cared for minds are going to automatically have an advantage against materially deprived and disadvantaged minds. Your science fiction provides a narrative escape from reality, doesn’t deal with reality at all, doesn’t live in reality. Mass suffering is already taking place because of inequality and superstition.

5

Excellent_Fig3662 t1_j3hqonp wrote

This really seems quite ridiculous and sensationalist to me. Major emotional emphasis is placed on the word “collapse.” The real problem is going to be what it has always been, lack of equality, justice, intelligence within the social order.

41