Exel0n
Exel0n t1_ixtgue1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The West is slowly rebuilding its rare earths supply chain. by BalticsFox
not really. imo the regulations in the west is way too strict and bascially kidnapped by the hysteria and paranoid of a small group of extremist.
china and soviet union bascially killed off most of the apex predators, like tigers (for soviets, the Caspian tigers), most leopards, bears, crocodiles (yangtze crocodiles). according to the western "ecologists" their eco system should have collapsed and everyone there living in hellscape now. the truth is different.
rare earth mining requires lots of acids. but those acids are organic and will dissolve in the natural environment, and runoff to river and eventually to the ocean, and eventually convert into other materials (they hardly exist in nature in pure form for a reason, coz they react with other mateirals which cause them to cease to exist).
so those acids used in mining, they actually dont do that much harm. but the environmentalists gonna have mental breakdown seeing all those colorful acid pools and miles and miles of barren land of mining and cry out its environmental catostrophy and the media will help them to stir up mass hysteria to shut or limit those mining.
meanwhile china can do it as what it wants and benefit. thats a massive advantage that the west might never catch up in our lifetime simply coz the west is too irrational when it comes to "pollution", even relatively harmless ones.
Exel0n t1_ixtd52g wrote
china's advantage is regulation arbitrage. their environmental law enforcement is low and allows those mines to pollute a lot, which can never happen in the west. therefore their cost of production of rare earth is, well, dirt cheap.
it's not that the west doesn't have rare earths, its just the cost of production is not even on the same order of magnitude, which makes most mines not financially feasible to operate
Exel0n t1_ixbgj7q wrote
i agree. anti tech must be silenced here. otherwise it woud just turn into like libertarian sub where socialists and so on roam on and outnumber actual libertarians coz muuuuuuuuuuh free speech. meanwhile socialism and communism subs censor opposite viewpoints with ban hammers all the time.
Exel0n t1_iwz9ifc wrote
Reply to comment by targ_ in The time it took to get to the moon. by Redvolition
ubi is stupid. millionaires and billionaire do not need it. why should they get ubi when they pay taxes already?
unemployment benefit is all it needs. just increase it
Exel0n t1_iwyqde8 wrote
Reply to META has released a new AI tool called Galactica that auto-generates science content. The problem is that it's terrible, and soon its inaccurate and bogus content will drown out real science information. by lughnasadh
dont like, then dont use. stop complainign. only reason those "scientists" complaing and wanting it banned is coz they feel THREATENED by the AI. the AI will take their job eventually.
Exel0n t1_iwyqaoa wrote
Reply to Motional and Lyft will launch a robotaxi service in Los Angeles - The Autonomous Vehicle operator is a joint venture between Hyundai and Aptiv. LA will be its second robotaxi market with Lyft, after launching a service in Las Vegas earlier this year. by izumi3682
robotaxis dont overcharge you or driving in loops to charge you more.
Exel0n t1_iwypn5g wrote
Reply to comment by jezra in Motional and Lyft will launch a robotaxi service in Los Angeles - The Autonomous Vehicle operator is a joint venture between Hyundai and Aptiv. LA will be its second robotaxi market with Lyft, after launching a service in Las Vegas earlier this year. by izumi3682
and whats the problem with that? sharing profits? if those humans dont want that job then dont work or work some other job.
Exel0n t1_iwxtt4v wrote
Reply to comment by frequenttimetraveler in Meta has withdrawn its Galactica AI, only 3 days after its release, following intense criticism. Meta’s misstep—and its hubris—show once again that Big Tech has a blind spot about the severe limitations of large language models in AI. by lughnasadh
they feel threatened by AI. when money is on the line, they do everything to stop it.
Exel0n t1_iwxtjb4 wrote
Reply to Meta has withdrawn its Galactica AI, only 3 days after its release, following intense criticism. Meta’s misstep—and its hubris—show once again that Big Tech has a blind spot about the severe limitations of large language models in AI. by lughnasadh
the acadamia feel threatened by this AI, simple as that. there's no reason to manufacture some outrage to take it down. if one doesnt like it, dont use it.
it's just like doctors who feel threatened by literally google. or teachers/professors who felt threatened by wikipedia like 10 years ago
Exel0n t1_iwbpvj2 wrote
Reply to comment by rodchenko in Waymo’s driverless taxis keep making incremental progress, while others flounder by AdmiralKurita
the average car spent like 90% of the time parked. a AV is active most of the time. average human-driven car are way way more wasteful of resources than AV.
Exel0n t1_ixyz9j6 wrote
Reply to Vaccine to prevent UTIs could be taken as a dissolving tablet by tonymmorley
great. having to get a needle stuck in the body is a underrated barrier to vaccine adoptation. polio was eradicated in most of the world so easily partiailly coz the solution was so easy and welcomed by children.... a sugar ball, or two at different times. way easier than needle.