You’re an idiot, I already said I didn’t say anything was sentient or not I said anything is possible. How old are you, 12? Nothing more to argue here if you continue to be that obtuse I’ll just block you.

Who knows but usually for NASA and the Military it’s the exact opposite at least for hardware in the field, because often the hardware needs to be battle hardened, or in the case of NASA, radiation hardened.

I know for one NASA often uses very old chips in space, like special versions of 1980s/1990s CPUs because they are less vulnerable to cosmic/solar radiation, extreme temperatures, etc.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but you’re saying all this with NO definition of what sentience is. You don’t realize how ridiculous it is to think you know better than anyone on something which there isn’t a good definition of and you admittedly don’t have any better definition either? lol You can’t see how futile that is? lol

might you fricking troll. lol.

It’s one thing if you can give a detailed argument why not, like a good definition of sentience. Which you don’t have.

If you don’t even know what it is, then your argument is emotional and nothing more.

Oh oh we found the guy who knows it all already, let’s give him a nobel prize and OpenAI should hire you lol

It has a “style” just like some image generation models might have, for example you might have an Anime GAN, or a GAN that outputs in the style of Van Gogh.

It basically comes down to it’s something we vaguely know that we have, but don’t have a concrete definition for. We just kind of know it is something complex. Your toaster probably doesn’t have it. Your dog might. An LLM is still not complex enough, it doesn’t have memory, etc, therefore we assume it’s not sentient.

Something like that lmao

I’m already considering it lol

??????? ok? I’ll go tell Andrew right now and get back to you on what he says. ????

Don’t worry. Soon the singularity will take care of this and you won’t need to complain.

Competition is great, but we all know Google will hype it up for 1 year and then silently cancel it or throw it on the back burner and effectively cancel it through neglect.

Yep, we are seeing it in real-time. Anyone who knows a bit about Deep Learning, follows it, has explored GPT-3 and then ChatGPT should see how the reinforcement learning tacked onto ChatGPT is just nerfing it and making it inferior compared to what it could be. It messes with it in ways they can’t seem to control very well, if they care at all.

Google is by far the leader. They invented the transformer model that GPT is based on after all. Where they differ is that they always keep it to themselves and release papers but no code and. k access to anyone outside Google.

Oh there’s no doubt that they have the software and models. It’s their culture of announcing them without allowing the public to touch it.