Feeez_Shato
Feeez_Shato t1_j9uh8hh wrote
Reply to comment by 726wox in 'LIV has to get stronger - or it will disappear' by rejs7
Live, like the opposite of Jamal Khashoggi? Probably.
Feeez_Shato t1_j9ugnzv wrote
Reply to comment by bimbles_ap in 'LIV has to get stronger - or it will disappear' by rejs7
Slavers PR campaign- lol.
Feeez_Shato t1_j9ugkqy wrote
Disappear like a US journalist who pissed off a Saudi royal slaver?
Feeez_Shato t1_j9n9yr9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Magnitude 7.2 earthquake strikes Tajikistan, near border with China by Papppi-56
Probably a knock off kaiju w a fake Versace logo and sloppy stitching.
Feeez_Shato t1_j97lhic wrote
Reply to Review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s research, colleagues allege by ScoMoTrudeauApricot
I wonder how closely Stanford is following the demise of it’s public image. Beyond the Bankmans and Frieds it seems like there are starting to be a lot of stories involving fraud coming out of there. Makes sense when you consider their links to the Silicon Valley culture of today.
Feeez_Shato t1_j1elmqj wrote
Feeez_Shato t1_iujvb7z wrote
Reply to Study shows that sexual activity within 30 min to 24 h before exercise does not appear to affect aerobic fitness, musculoskeletal endurance, or strength/power. by [deleted]
Which sucks because "No sex before you ex" was such a catchy phrase.
Feeez_Shato t1_jawmhk1 wrote
Reply to US approved 192 licenses for exports to blacklisted Chinese firms early 2022 by Neo2199
Sorry reporters, but there’s always a single person who is responsible for a business or corporate action - it’s not the admin who updated the spreadsheet, it’s whoever is in charge of the company, the department, the branch of government, etc. you want to make a difference? You better start naming them. Let them try to explain it away themselves instead of painting a “well there’s nothing we can do about it” scenario right from the jump. That just makes you complicit.