New pipe for phones.

AI's are arguably the biggest technological advance right now. If they can't be discussed in a sub dedicated to technological advances then that sub is pointless.

“Data” as in the knowledge the AI has gained from the training, yes. Just like an art student remembers the styles and techniques they've learnt.

OK, I think I got it. How does this disprove my comment again?

I don't understand this. Explain exactly this refutes my point in simple words, please.

The memory is updated using the copyrighted AI.”? Excuse me? Or do you mean “the memory is updated using copyrighted material ”?

OK, then. The argument is:

“Programmers are using other people's images to teach their AI's, just like you would teach an art student to learn styles and techniques from previous paintings. Once the AI has learned, those images are not stored anywhere in the AI's code.”

Now refute it.

My original argument was:

“No, programmers are using other people's images to teach their AI's, just like you would teach an art student to learn styles and techniques from previous paintings. Once the AI has learned, those images are not stored anywhere in the AI's code.”

You said it was wrong, yet your comment

“People can also take inspiration from every other object to build artwork. This machine learning, is only using artwork, so the sample size [...]”

doesn't refute said argument. So either say something to refute my argument which, according to you is wrong or stop trying to move the goalposts.

So? That doesn't refute my point.

AIs learn how other artists paint so they can paint in the same style. That's what literally every art student does and it's not the same as copying.

“AI literally has to use copyrighted work to build the query setup by the user.”

The AI learned from copyrighted material to produce original results with the given prompts, just like anyone can learn from copyrighted material and make paintings in the style of (not exactly like) said material.

What I explained is literally how AI's work, what do you mean?

Not comparable in terms of results, sure, but the process is still one of learning. Now, should AI's be prevented from learning just because they're faster than humans? That would be another debate.

No, programmers are using other people's images to teach their AI's, just like you would teach an art student to learn styles and techniques from previous paintings. Once the AI has learned, those images are not stored anywhere in the AI's code.

Based on =/= copying. Humans can make paintings inspired in others and it's legal.

Based on =/= copying. Humans can make paintings inspired in others and it's legal.