At Home maintained a property I was at for 2 years, no issues aside from the occasional late rent payment, which was always paid with late payment fees added and they were informed of it being late as soon as I knew it would be.
I was in the place 5 years before that. As soon as they could after lease I was informed via a letter taped to my door (no knocks or calls) that I would need to have a new place as they were uninterested in leasing to me further and that I had 45 days.
They raised the rent on that property by 450$ for the next tenant according to the neighbors I still talked to after my move.
I would recommend avoiding them if you have a choice, personally.
Fyev t1_isw8zqo wrote
Reply to your thoughts (as tenants) on at home real estate and Dizmang properties? by Snoo_84090
At Home maintained a property I was at for 2 years, no issues aside from the occasional late rent payment, which was always paid with late payment fees added and they were informed of it being late as soon as I knew it would be.
I was in the place 5 years before that. As soon as they could after lease I was informed via a letter taped to my door (no knocks or calls) that I would need to have a new place as they were uninterested in leasing to me further and that I had 45 days.
They raised the rent on that property by 450$ for the next tenant according to the neighbors I still talked to after my move.
I would recommend avoiding them if you have a choice, personally.