G2046H

G2046H t1_j0qsg7w wrote

Dude, you don’t have a leg to stand on anymore. You are just embarrassing yourself at this point. Also, maybe try bringing solutions to the table, next time. Instead of just standing there like a whiny, little elitist and critiquing others for their’s. That literally serves no purpose. You need to try harder.

Whatever, it’s Sunday. I have better things to do with my time, than continue on with this low-level debate, with a total stranger. I’m sorry that you are so bothered. Try and chill out. OK?

Have a great day :)

0

G2046H t1_j0qeqye wrote

Read the post with the article about the city trying to help billion-dollar corporations from shoplifting loss, and then also say that they can’t afford help the “little people”.

If you have a better solution, then I would love to hear it. Otherwise, it sounds like you’re saying that if innocent civilians get murdered, then “Oh well.”. I’m listening.

−1

G2046H t1_j0q2ij8 wrote

So, some idiot was bullying me yesterday on another post, here on this sub, about how he believes that using taxpayer money to prevent people from stealing his coffee at Starbucks, is money very well spent. How about this city make Starbucks pay for that and then spend our money on helping their citizens, in a real way? Like, preventing women from getting stabbed to death? Does that sound like a good idea?

0