No but I’m saying in this example it doesn’t really matter because it doesn’t need to be precise

Just a pet peeve that Reddit assumes median is always a better representation when we don’t have the actual distribution

Of course. Mean and media won’t be exact unless it’s normal, bimodal, etc

But why act as though it’s going to be a meaningful difference?

The CEO is saying the average user is older than you would assume(teenagers/college). That’s it. Even if the median and mean are different by several years, that’s still generally going to be the same point.

It just seems the easy Reddit contrarian point of “um aktually median is better” (hence multiple comments saying the same thing) when they’re probably not that much different to begin with

But if there aren’t any 2 year old users then they’re excluded from the distribution anyways and both mean and median aren’t going to be impacted anyways

And if there are it’s not going to meaningfully affect the mean or median. Unless there’s more 2 year olds online than I expected…

Ok so for age…? Is there someone a million years old?

Why? It’s not like there are big outliers with people living 10,000 years… can’t imagine it’s too different