Gagarin1961

Gagarin1961 t1_iu55ztm wrote

I have looked into it, but there is no big push to turn the military green. No politician is talking about it.

I guess because it can’t be used for divisive purposes? Are the democrats really using climate change to “get” corporations or do they want to actually put effort into the emissions they actually control?

−4

Gagarin1961 t1_iu4p2f6 wrote

Never understood why Democrats never pushed to move the military past the strategically important, but limited in quantity, fossil fuels.

If they want to push the world forward, transitioning the worlds largest producer of emissions is an important start… yet it’s just a minor consideration. They have control over the worlds largest producer of emissions, and they don’t even care.

−7

Gagarin1961 t1_itr4qav wrote

Not to mention, unidentified threats to national security wouldn’t be handled by fucking NASA.

What kind of joke is this? Are they just playing into the meme for political gain or are they using it as some kind of distraction? Or are they planning on releasing whatever fake story they want through these guys as if it were the truth?

−1

Gagarin1961 t1_iswcbr3 wrote

In the end, our enemies will just develop them anyway, and their use will be necessary to defend against senseless aggression.

I’m not even sure this letter is a good idea. I really don’t want Russian/Chinese robots marching over all of Europe and/or Taiwan.

I can get not wanting to be the first to use them, but outright promising never to build them? Practically irresponsible.

15