Gathorall

Gathorall t1_j6w9xpb wrote

Coming to the concepts of sensitivity and specifity.

The sensitivity of this test would have to be nery near to 100% especially when as you said, most people aren’t cheats; just a few percentage points off sensitivity can mean that a large absolute part of the people "caught" are actually innocent.

2

Gathorall t1_j6m6tyk wrote

A when A. In addition it is also apparent that being lucky causes boldness on its own and vice versa: a person who often succeeds is eager to try, someone who fails more than their share is going to be hesitant with even little risk.

52

Gathorall t1_j6f4qgv wrote

And that's in a holdover from when their worth was based on being of valuable metals, which was why old currency conversions seemed kinda arbitrary, manufacturing and handling determined the size and coins would then be worth whatever was the exchange rate of the material.

11

Gathorall t1_j2fosuv wrote

That's true, but there's another side to the absolutism argument? Are we really that desperate for roof?

In many cities preserved buildings count well under or just barely over a dozen, is it worth risking the cultural value for a few square meters of solar panels?

Pompei is a special case at it is huge and disconnected from modern cities so power by other means is disruptive as well.

1

Gathorall t1_iuifqxz wrote

19