Give_me_the_science

Give_me_the_science t1_j8ygfnd wrote

Welcome to Reddit.

People must think that as moderators we're spending all day reading all comments from our 18.2 million members. We don't and that would be insane. Instead, we split the work up and each of us are assigned just 1 million to follow and police. /s

If you want to post something like your s-curve hypothesis and it's backed up by some semblance of credible sources, cool, but posts that just come across as crazy rants don't work. People will downvote the post and the comments will be mocking in nature.

Evidence based on a plausible hypothesis for the future are welcome.

1

Give_me_the_science t1_j5cf7zr wrote

Solar, wind and storage. Cheaper to maintain and build, plus more reliable.

Edit: I'm not anti nuclear, it's just not economical vs what I'm suggesting. It just takes engineering and planning to make it work. Pumped hydro, thermal sand storage, iron air batteries (no lithium), compressed air is even cost effective. Read up, nuclear, coal, gas are all going to be more expensive vs storage solutions.

1