GlobusGlobus
GlobusGlobus t1_jcy1k1k wrote
Reply to comment by S3ndD1ckP1cs in Teachers wanted to ban calculators in 1988. Now, they want to ban ChatGPT. by redbullkongen
With the Use of the timeless decision theory, as developed by Eliezer Yudkowski, I am pretty convinced that we can figure this out.
GlobusGlobus t1_jcxr3u1 wrote
Reply to comment by S3ndD1ckP1cs in Teachers wanted to ban calculators in 1988. Now, they want to ban ChatGPT. by redbullkongen
Dear S3ndD1ckP1cs,
Do you want your dickpicks before or after the singularity?
Best,
Globus
GlobusGlobus t1_j9pj33r wrote
Reply to Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
I have heard this take several times now. It is the worst take.
What he is trying to say is nothing has any meaning and that we can as well just focus all our attention to maximize genocide and rape. Very useless opinion.
GlobusGlobus t1_j9l14gv wrote
Reply to comment by gentleman339 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Underapreciated.
GlobusGlobus t1_j9jasjc wrote
Reply to comment by Atheios569 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
In a sex dungeon?
GlobusGlobus t1_j9iu4ny wrote
Reply to comment by xott in Two Deans suspended after using ChatGPT to write email to students by Neurogence
It is indeed very strange that they included the made by ChatGPT. The way to do it is, obviously, to make some edits and take full ownership. You used a tool, nothing more, nothing less.
I mean, you have to check everything from ChatGPT. I have used it for composition and sometimes it (obviously) get things completely wrong.
GlobusGlobus t1_j9itz1h wrote
Reply to comment by xott in Two Deans suspended after using ChatGPT to write email to students by Neurogence
100%
GlobusGlobus t1_j9ity9u wrote
Strange. Seems like a good use of the tool.
GlobusGlobus t1_j9ijxpj wrote
The one thing I know about Eliezer is that he wrote a delightful short story called The baby eating aliens. Read it. Regarding AI I have a very different view than what he has.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/n5TqCuizyJDfAPjkr/the-baby-eating-aliens-1-8
GlobusGlobus t1_j8w8k6m wrote
Reply to If 98% of people disappeared, would things tend towards greater freedom and progress? by kimjongun-69
No
We need more people. Next stop 100B.
GlobusGlobus t1_j6cv71s wrote
Reply to comment by Bataranger999 in Amazing. This subreddit is a total waste of time. by LoquaciousAntipodean
I came here for the vision of the unbelievable future, stayed for the puns.
GlobusGlobus t1_j5yct43 wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in Gary Marcus refuted?? by FusionRocketsPlease
I am not convinced either or, but it is a strange, and clearly false, assumption that all ML has AGI as a goal. Most of the time people just want to solve a problem.
GlobusGlobus t1_j5wd3ux wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in Gary Marcus refuted?? by FusionRocketsPlease
Some of Marcus' comments are so strange because he always thinks about AGI and seems to to think that other people also think that way. His critique against ChatGPT is that he doesn't think it is a fast way to reach AGI. He basically says we should scrap GPT and do other things. I agree on GPT not being a steep stepping stone towards AGI, I don't think GPT has much at all to do with AGI. But that is not the point! GPT3 is a fantastic tool made to solve lots of things. Even if it never has anything to do with AGI it still worth an insane amount of money and will be extremely beneficial.
For me GPT might be more important than AGI. Each time Marcus speaks he just assumes that everyone's goal is AGI. It is very strange.
GlobusGlobus t1_j5492u1 wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
Yes, this seems to be his argument.
It is still astonishing. Most people think fusion in the business *might* be physically possible in twenty to thirty years and even at that point it is unclear if it economically viable.
GlobusGlobus t1_j51i4vk wrote
Reply to comment by gay_manta_ray in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
He doesn't say energy costs will be zero, he says that marginal electricity costs will go towards zero. It is a very different thing. The base infra structure will always be a big investment. But e.g. solar power plus a very (very) large amount of batteries can lead to very cheap marginal cost.
GlobusGlobus t1_j51htnr wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
This is much, much more bullish than anyone I have ever heard being on fusion. A commercial fusion plant readdy 2028 sounds completely insane. It is very different even from other fusion bulls. I wonder if he knows, something, or if he is talking out of his ass.
GlobusGlobus t1_j1nbrd3 wrote
Reply to Money Will Kill ChatGPT’s Magic by vernes1978
No, money will make it better.
GlobusGlobus t1_izsn48a wrote
Reply to comment by brotherkaramasov in This subreddit has a pretty serious anti-capitalist bias by Sieventer
Well, without open markets we would have no markets and people like you would go around and willy nilly kill people like me.
Yes, I know how the internet came to be. Everything important, like not everyone starving to death, like not everyone being on a constant killing spree, is due to open markets.
We have tested not having open markets. It was hell.
I think there are things in life that is more valuable than maximization of violence, poverty, and genocide. I understand that you don't agree with me. But please don't force that choice on us, you bastard.
GlobusGlobus t1_izrrj5w wrote
Reply to comment by brotherkaramasov in This subreddit has a pretty serious anti-capitalist bias by Sieventer
This is the history of the world:
- Everything was horrible.
- Open markets started to appear->
- things got better
Every single thing that is a bit better than rock bottom comes from open markets.
GlobusGlobus t1_izenmke wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in ChatGPT will put us all out of jobs soon enough! by fayad-k
Realistically it will be paid in tiers. I need ChatGPT now, I want to pay. Right now it is too slow. I want to pay for a fast version.
GlobusGlobus t1_izen4v4 wrote
Reply to comment by Heinrick_Veston in ChatGPT will put us all out of jobs soon enough! by fayad-k
This is awsome.
GlobusGlobus t1_izen30d wrote
Not me
GlobusGlobus t1_izaxl4x wrote
Reply to What do you think of all the recent very vocal detractors of AI generated art? by razorbeamz
They crazy
GlobusGlobus t1_iye1hgq wrote
Reply to comment by Keepfingthatchicken in Autism Breakthrough: New Treatment Significantly Improves Social Skills and Brain Function by Shelfrock77
Yeah, I know. My point is that people who lack an interest that fits that discription are all rather meaningless creatures without any stake. As born out by reality.
GlobusGlobus t1_jedvqxh wrote
Reply to Will LLMs accelerate the adoption of English as a primary language? by ReadditOnReddit
GPT-4 is amazing at translation. Like, very very good.
Open AI claims that they mostly trained it on English, but it works very well in many other languages. Personally I use it Swedish and Turkish. There is a big step up in handling other languages in GPT4 compared to GPT3. GPT3 have problems with Swedish sayings and things like that, GPT4 handles it like a king.