GlobusGlobus

GlobusGlobus t1_jedvqxh wrote

GPT-4 is amazing at translation. Like, very very good.

Open AI claims that they mostly trained it on English, but it works very well in many other languages. Personally I use it Swedish and Turkish. There is a big step up in handling other languages in GPT4 compared to GPT3. GPT3 have problems with Swedish sayings and things like that, GPT4 handles it like a king.

1

GlobusGlobus t1_j9pj33r wrote

I have heard this take several times now. It is the worst take.

What he is trying to say is nothing has any meaning and that we can as well just focus all our attention to maximize genocide and rape. Very useless opinion.

2

GlobusGlobus t1_j9iu4ny wrote

It is indeed very strange that they included the made by ChatGPT. The way to do it is, obviously, to make some edits and take full ownership. You used a tool, nothing more, nothing less.

I mean, you have to check everything from ChatGPT. I have used it for composition and sometimes it (obviously) get things completely wrong.

6

GlobusGlobus t1_j5wd3ux wrote

Some of Marcus' comments are so strange because he always thinks about AGI and seems to to think that other people also think that way. His critique against ChatGPT is that he doesn't think it is a fast way to reach AGI. He basically says we should scrap GPT and do other things. I agree on GPT not being a steep stepping stone towards AGI, I don't think GPT has much at all to do with AGI. But that is not the point! GPT3 is a fantastic tool made to solve lots of things. Even if it never has anything to do with AGI it still worth an insane amount of money and will be extremely beneficial.

For me GPT might be more important than AGI. Each time Marcus speaks he just assumes that everyone's goal is AGI. It is very strange.

1

GlobusGlobus t1_j51i4vk wrote

He doesn't say energy costs will be zero, he says that marginal electricity costs will go towards zero. It is a very different thing. The base infra structure will always be a big investment. But e.g. solar power plus a very (very) large amount of batteries can lead to very cheap marginal cost.

1

GlobusGlobus t1_j51htnr wrote

This is much, much more bullish than anyone I have ever heard being on fusion. A commercial fusion plant readdy 2028 sounds completely insane. It is very different even from other fusion bulls. I wonder if he knows, something, or if he is talking out of his ass.

1

GlobusGlobus t1_izsn48a wrote

Well, without open markets we would have no markets and people like you would go around and willy nilly kill people like me.

Yes, I know how the internet came to be. Everything important, like not everyone starving to death, like not everyone being on a constant killing spree, is due to open markets.

We have tested not having open markets. It was hell.

I think there are things in life that is more valuable than maximization of violence, poverty, and genocide. I understand that you don't agree with me. But please don't force that choice on us, you bastard.

2