Grantagonist
Grantagonist t1_j8kpltr wrote
Reply to comment by Cash907 in Why Is the ‘Night Court’ Revival Such a Massive Hit? by LynnK0919
Oh man, I forgot about Chi McBride as the janitor!
Cracked me up when I next saw him as the super-serious principal in Boston Public. Such a contrast.
Grantagonist t1_j8ih4ly wrote
Reply to comment by CoolIceCreamCone in Why Is the ‘Night Court’ Revival Such a Massive Hit? by LynnK0919
Funny, I disagree on those points exactly. I think Rauch hasn't quite found the right tone, and Lucretta is playing a bit too broad. I think the characters would both benefit from the actors dialing it back just a little. (Same with de Beaufort.)
Night Court was all over syndication in the 90s. It was a contemporary of Cheers, not Seinfeld and Friends. I don't know how old you are, but I'm guessing it just got cycled out of syndication before your time.
Grantagonist t1_j8ig7dy wrote
I keep watching it, even though it’s pretty rough so far. de Beaufort and Lucretta are playing way too broad. Talwalker’s character offers nothing of interest yet. The laugh track feels more fake than usual. Rauch’s take doesn’t quite fit; maybe if she dials back the cheeriness...?
Larroquette is still perfect, and the only reason I keep watching in the hopes they figure it out.
Grantagonist t1_j8ifyy1 wrote
Reply to comment by Cash907 in Why Is the ‘Night Court’ Revival Such a Massive Hit? by LynnK0919
I remember it being pretty great. (My favorite joke, such as I remember it: "You're done already?" "No, someone said 'come in'.")
I don't remember the second season, though. What changed?
Grantagonist t1_j5xdj13 wrote
Reply to comment by grayscalemamba in Cancelling 'Reaper' after 2 seasons is still one of the worst decisions ever made by a TV Network by sundaynightheat99
He went back and changed her fate? Oof. (I didn't watch past mid-S3.)
It was hilarious how one of Hiro's big lessons in season 1 was learning that he can't change the past... and then S2 starts with a core story about him going back to change the past. (Something like that.)
It's honestly a miracle fluke that the first season was somehow good.
Grantagonist t1_j5wqv7a wrote
Reply to Cancelling 'Reaper' after 2 seasons is still one of the worst decisions ever made by a TV Network by sundaynightheat99
Wanna know how it was supposed to end? Fazekas spilled the beans in this interview!
> As for Sam and the question of who his father really was, this one’s a doozy: “If you remember, Dad wasn’t dead. And there was a whole reason why he wasn’t dead. Basically, the whole premise that never actually had the chance to come out was the idea that Dad was a demon, who made a deal with the Devil. He fell in love with Sam’s mom and wanted to marry her. So the deal was, fine, you’re not a demon anymore. He was never fully human, either, which is why you can’t kill him. So, in the pilot, when he said he was really sick and made a deal with the Devil, he wasn’t 100% lying nor 100% telling the truth. And this is the reason why Sam is special: Sam is part human, part demon.” > > Boom. > > “Sam was led to believe he was the Devil’s son, but that wasn’t true. That’s not the reason Sam had powers — the powers came from his father. His father was really his father. And part of his deal was that he was never really allowed to tell Sam the truth, and that’s the reason why he says to him ‘there’s more to this than I can tell you.’ And part of what we tried to get out of all of this was that Sam really is special. That’s the reason why, at the end of the last season, Steve comes to him and says Sam is caught between good and evil. What we hoped to get out of the third season was what part did Sam have to play? Sam’s whole existence, and the reason the Devil was paying so much attention to him and hanging out with him so much was because there was a reason: Sam was half-human and half-demon, and the Devil was really worried that this kid was going to be his downfall. If you look at what the Devil is doing throughout the series, he’s trying to tempt Sam to be bad. And he’s trying to tempt him to embrace this, that what you’re doing isn’t so bad. The whole point was that if he can turn Sam bad, the Sam isn’t a threat anymore.”
There's a little more besides in the interview, definitely worth a read.
Grantagonist t1_iuywssn wrote
Reply to comment by PomegranatePlanet in TIL the former members of Timbuk 3 have refused to license the song "The Future's So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades" for commercials, including a $900,000 offer from AT&T and offers from Ford, the U.S. Army, and Bausch & Lomb for their Ray-Ban sunglasses. by big_macaroons
Wow, it’s not just me who thought of that
Grantagonist t1_iu31ifz wrote
Reply to TIL when it was discovered in 1963 that the Winchester manuscript of Le Morte d'Arthur was indeed Thomas Malory's, John Steinbeck caught wind of it and decided to translate it into modern English. Ultimately he abandoned the project, but what remained was published after his death. by psgamemaster
Heh, I read this. Found a paperback copy at my library’s book sale like 15 years ago. It was fine, but it didn’t blow my mind.
Grantagonist t1_itzmmbh wrote
Reply to Paul Mescal to Lead Espionage Thriller ‘A Spy by Nature’ for Kevin Macdonald by MarvelsGrantMan136
Apparently this is not the Kevin McDonald from Kids in the Hall.
Grantagonist t1_jab36r9 wrote
Reply to The Day the Librarians Disappeared - We Can't Let This Story Come True! by playplaylearn
At first read I thought you said “libertarians” and I was like, “ooh, tell me more!”