Off topic but I love how underpants gnomes memes are still relevant 25 years later

You and everyone else here

Not funny

Study CS and come up with a solution and you can be very rich

No, because the predictive text needs the entire conversation history context to predict what to say next, and the only way to store the conversation history is in RAM. If you run out of RAM you run out of room for returns.

Not if there is a token limit.

I'm sorry, I don't think I was being clear. The token limit is tied to VRAM. You can load the 30b on a 3090 but it shallows up 20/24 gb of VRAM for the model and prompt alone. That gives you 4gb for returns

Considering you can explore context with ChatGPT and bing through multiple returns, not exactly. You need to hit it on your first attempt

Depends on prompt size which is going to dictate that quality of the return. 300 tokens?

I got 30b running on a 3090 machine, but the token return is very limited

Llama is a LLM that you can download and run on your own hardware.

Alpaca is, apparently, a modification of the 7b version of Llama that is as strong as GPT-3.

This bodes well for having your own LLM, unfiltered, run locally. But still, progress needs to improve.

I think you may be overstating human creativity. There are plenty of visionaries among us who create new concepts, but the vast many of us are -boring-. We share the same memes and when we try to make our own memes they fall flat. How many people do you know have tried to write a book, and it ends up being rife with established tropes? How many hit songs use the same four chord progression? When was the last time you experienced something -truly- unique? It's been a long time for me, that's for sure.

So I don't think "making something totally unique" is the best metric for AGI. Being able to infer things? That's where I'm at. But I'm not an expert, so don't take what I'm claiming as gospel

I mean, not every human has the creativity to create new things. But that doesn't mean they aren't intelligent

I feel like the best metric I can think of that is totally feasible is this: When we are able to show an AI a video without dialogue, with all of the concepts being delivered strictly by how human actors are interacting in the video, if the AI is able to tell you all about the video in precise detail, we're right there. I honestly think this isn't very far off (10-20 years). There's plenty of Python APIs that are able to detect what objects are in live video, the next step is understanding interactions and once it can comprehend something that it itself can't ever reproduce, AGI is imminent.

Fuck dude, that's clever

I for one welcome competition in the race to AGI

A lot of these are not ai development. Disappointing if this is all that is measured as progress

The Rivet Joint was probably observing the Ukraine War, no?

Not until we understand our own brains

I think you are going to see a lot of companies releasing AI software who helps you do your jobs. It will provide suggestions but AI won't be able to do the job for you. Let's say someone sends you an e-mail asking about a project. The AI will be to read the e-mail, look at your calendar and details about the project, and provide suggestions for an e-mail response.

Drill a hole in my head

This

I mean I would have to do some editing, sure. But the actual art?? I can command a computer to produce whatever I want

I've been toying around with Simple Diffusion and I feel like I could make my own Manga with some of the models that are out there, completely auto generated. Like, this is insane the quality that ai art is pumping out with simple text prompts and editing weights