HillaryPutin t1_jb5lqyr wrote on March 6, 2023 at 4:41 PM

Reply to comment by Silly_Awareness8207 in What might slow this down? by Beautiful-Cancel6235

Just give it an antipsychotic

HillaryPutin t1_jb1ovl4 wrote on March 5, 2023 at 7:29 PM

Reply to comment by Zealousideal_Low1287 in [R] [N] Dropout Reduces Underfitting - Liu et al. by radi-cho

Bro sounds like the discussion comments in some of my university courses

HillaryPutin t1_ja9g4xv wrote on February 27, 2023 at 8:41 PM

Reply to comment by Surur in Observing the Lazy Advocates of AI and UBI in this Subreddit by d00m_sayer

I'd prefer to travel across the universe visiting exotic planets

HillaryPutin t1_ja9fxx5 wrote on February 27, 2023 at 8:40 PM

Reply to comment by Diaza_Kinutz in Observing the Lazy Advocates of AI and UBI in this Subreddit by d00m_sayer

Yeah, never once has the employee benefitted in compensation from technology/automation.

HillaryPutin t1_j5zc9ab wrote on January 26, 2023 at 4:51 PM

Reply to Shutterstock Has Launched Its Own AI Image Generation Tool by vadhavaniyafaijan

>Shutterstock claims it will pay artists whose work is included in its Al generation. Shutterstock will do this through a "Contributor Fund. The fund will "directly compensate Shutterstock contributors" if their IP is used to develop Al-generative models, such as the OpenAl model, through licensing data from Shutterstock's database.

This is good in concept, but did they ask all contributors for permission? I could see this being a disaster financially for independent photographers/artists. Imagine going from selling several hundred images a day to you "contributing to an AI" several hundred times a day and making pennies. I predict this will end poorly.