Hobbyprinterguy

Hobbyprinterguy t1_iy5djqr wrote

What your missing is that if he’s in his room he’s not exposed to the public. There is no law against waking around naked or partially dressed inside your hotel room or any other place you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. When he opened the door and she saw him. Maybe he’s a nudist. I’m just being the devils advocate. What’s right and moral is not always the same as legal or not. Yes his accidental with the police could be tough but you would have to prove he’s in public and hotels that have a locked door and a desk that only allows guests of the hotel is not technically a Public place. So the hotel would have to tell him to stop and evict him. Arresting him was probably a mistake by the law. This is just my opinion as a retired police office

2

Hobbyprinterguy t1_ixz0mkb wrote

When this goes to court. It will be dismissed. He was in his hotel room not in public. The girl was 17 well above the age of consent and technically not a minor except for alcohol purchase which is why no charges related to a child were included. He had no prior knowledge of her age even and therefore there is no element of knowingly exposing to a child. If she was a child. But by law she is not. MA allows open nudity in public as long as an attempt to conceal yourself is made. This is case law for all the people engaging in sexual activity in rest areas and other public places. Which is illegal in theory but thanks to liberal judges is not easily enforceable. He will claim he had a bathrobe on in his hotel room and was just getting his food. An accident. And if he didn’t touch himself it will be an accident. He will probably file a lawsuit against the police for arresting him and giving the story to the press so he can be publicly humiliated for what will amount to a dismissal. As far as his job, at most it will be reduced to a misdemeanor indecent exposure and not a felony which will mean he keeps his job.

−2

Hobbyprinterguy t1_ixtc8t9 wrote

I’m a retired police officer from MA. If you lose possession of your vehicle. And have a valid registration and insurance yo7 can swap the plates. But you are required to have a bill of sale and a stamped RMV1 form which is the application for registration. The insurance companies will issue it to you already filled out. You have 7 days to drive the vehicle you purchased as long as the insurance company has agreed to insure the new vehicle. They issue a Stamp on the RMV1 form. So the answer is yes it can be done. But it’s not just throw a plate on and drive. Yes you may get away with it but if you have not gone to the insurance company it’s a crime. You could be charged with driving an unregistered uninsured motor vehicle. The later is a criminal offense and your car will be towed and your license plates seized

1

Hobbyprinterguy t1_ivwe7g9 wrote

Reply to comment by BF1shY in Can someone explain question 1 by [deleted]

I see all these comments about paying a fair share. How is it fair if you pay a higher percentage then the next guy for the same and in most cases less benefits. Consider that financial assistance paid from the taxes collected is distributed according to income where the people that pay the most taxes get the least and usually no assistance. Why should someone be punished because they happen to have a job where they make more money then the next guy. I’ve worked my butt off since I was 15 years old in multiple jobs. After over 30 years of hard work I finally make a good paycheck and already am in a higher tax bracket then others. Which means after all my years of hard work I get to pay a larger portion of what I make to the government so they can mismanage it. Fair is everyone pays the same tax rate as the next guy. Stop using the term fair share unless you actually have a plan that is fair. Not just envy over what someone else worked hard to accomplish

0