Honest_Science
Honest_Science t1_jefdxss wrote
Reply to comment by Talkat in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Is it not the question whether we will have a time post AI?
Honest_Science t1_jef8oyr wrote
Reply to Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Meta makes great progress in embodiment. It seems already unstoppable.
Honest_Science t1_je4n50g wrote
Reply to comment by Bakagami- in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
No
Honest_Science t1_je4egbq wrote
Reply to comment by sillprutt in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
What makes you believe tha the signatures were faked and not, that the signees have pulled back because of some unpleasant calls from their investors? I would rather believe that nobody would have thought that this letter would create such a wave of uncertainty. It is a clear sign of total desperation because EVERYBODY knows that his will not happen.
Honest_Science t1_je4d408 wrote
Reply to comment by TorchNine in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
>"red flag law
And why is a red flag law not the right thing here?
Honest_Science t1_je4cvir wrote
Reply to comment by arisalexis in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
it is real and some of the names have been checked by Reuters, ALtman may have received a call from Microsoft and moved into denial.
Honest_Science t1_je4cru0 wrote
Reply to comment by brain_overclocked in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
I tried to get my name on the list and failed, because they say they check each and every name on the list before they submit and that would take days . This is strange, I would also believe that some of the people on the list do not want to be on the list anymore after they received a call from their investors.
Honest_Science t1_je0ebjt wrote
Reply to Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
1500 tools added today wtf
​
Honest_Science t1_jdcljn9 wrote
Reply to Why is this graph not a bigger deal? by __ingeniare__
you can even ask it for its confidence:
Honest_Science t1_jd1r2w4 wrote
Nobody wants to hear this, but a humanoid robot in a standard environment will generate terabytes of sensoric data per second. A human body has more than 70b nerve cells firing once per second. A current architecture AI Modell will learn a few months to just generate the foundation Modell for operating the robot. Walking in a room, opening a door etc.
Honest_Science t1_jasducq wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
Thank You for your comment. You are right we have robots for very specific tasks. I thought we are discussing here general humanoid tasks. Working in my kitchen for example is more complex than all of the working environments of all Tesla plants combined. Nothing has a very specific place. Food is packaged differently all the time etc. A robot will need world knowledge and human touch and feel capacity to master the extraordinary challenge to find an egg, check whether it still good, find a pan and create something eatable out of it. There is a reason why humanoid robot dev is going on for so many years and billions of USD. It is the most complex challenges of all we have faced so far.
Honest_Science t1_jas91pq wrote
Reply to comment by challengethegods in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
Intelligence needs the ability to generalize, narrow AI can barely generalize within the learning space. Emergence of understanding is demanding exponential resources. Any general robot needs a world understanding to be successful. This is also the challenge for FSD, there will always be situations that you can react on if you have world understanding, but fail if you are just an dreaming professor chauffeur.
Honest_Science t1_jas8ca4 wrote
Reply to comment by NanditoPapa in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
No evidence for this
Honest_Science t1_jas8a24 wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
What makes you say that? There is no evidence at all for your statement. The only working prototype to do human like general work is us. As evolution has optimized us many times it is very save to assume that another solution shall have the same level of complexity, as complexity is the only source of emergence. The same holds true for AGI btw. The number of neurons and the necessary compute for GPT X=8 will also be very close to projected human capacity.Xm years of evolution did obviously not such a bad job.
Honest_Science t1_jarjzow wrote
Reply to comment by IluvBsissa in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
Would you be able to work without any touch and feel? No, neither do they. It is unfortunately physically impossible as vision does not provide the same level of information.
Honest_Science t1_japvqqi wrote
This is not possible within 5 years! The human body needs about 100B sensors and more than 670 actors to function well. This is AGI^2. There is first some basic work to be done on artificial skin and superefficient actors. Let us remember that all of these actors and sensors are a extended part of the brain!
Honest_Science t1_ja8owjq wrote
Honest_Science t1_ja49qgv wrote
Reply to comment by Honest_Science in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Nobody likes me LOL, only downvotes
Honest_Science t1_ja1xm7e wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
My biggest problem is that the education of our kids at least in Europe is going down the drain so quickly, that the next level of chatgpt has nobody left to talk to. It is a tiktok world, concentration and focus is limited to max 15 seconds, nobody wants to get to their limits, the new religion is vegan or vegetarian and work life balance, diversity in all dimensions and saving the world of its ecological doomsday. No brain left for this.
Honest_Science t1_j9kx92l wrote
Reply to comment by Honest_Science in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
I tried to use their system on their playground. It takes a lot of prompting to get anything sensible out of it.
Honest_Science t1_j9kx3c4 wrote
Reply to comment by Villad_rock in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
That is really a nice one
Honest_Science t1_j454q17 wrote
Reply to comment by Zermelane in “100-1000 Times Better” – Tiny Magnetic Vortices Could Transform High-Performance Computers by Shelfrock77
You are right, memristors have still not been used widely
Honest_Science t1_j1oxuqi wrote
Reply to comment by TouchCommercial5022 in GPT-3.5 IQ testing using Raven’s Progressive Matrices by adt
What you are saying in the Kahneman nomenclature is that all systems so far are educated subconscious dreamers. I concur. We first need to break the consciousness barrier to get self control and reach system 2 thinking capacity.
Honest_Science t1_jeff94b wrote
Reply to Meta AI: Robots that learn from videos of human activities and simulated interactions by TFenrir
Getting closer to embodiment of #agi