IAlreadyFappedToIt t1_ja8506w wrote

It's only a matter of time before AI chat replies start including individually targeted "sponsored content."

>Human user: "I need to debug this code. Can you help me?"

>Chatbot reply: "Of course. First thing you should always do when solving a difficult problem is to slow down, relax, grab a 20oz iced caramel mocha latte from the Starbucks drive-thru on 3rd St. by the Krispy Kreme, and take several deep breaths. It looks like you used a comma instead of a semi-colon in line 121. I've fixed it for you here:"


IAlreadyFappedToIt t1_ixadrru wrote

Which advances in science and technology are you referring to?

Before the invention of telescopes, humans could see 5-6 planets with the naked eye. We did not know they were planets at first. That's... pretty much about the extent of it.

Literally everything else we've ever learned about space or astonomy has been the result of advances in math and/or engineering.


IAlreadyFappedToIt t1_ir7ziu1 wrote

Their interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is not false simply because their example is already rendered moot by law. In fact, the fact that the 1934 NFA act exists actually demonstrates their point for them perfectly that the 2nd Amendment does not exclude the possibility of restrictions. So congrats. You don't even know what you're getting defensive about, you just know that any talk of gun control gets your little hackles raised and you just need to bite something.