IAmOriginalRose

IAmOriginalRose t1_jdvubvy wrote

The way I understood it, their deaths were foretold. They were destined to die - they saw it in their visions and believed it. They didn’t have a choice but to die.

Their deaths were not the reason for the disasters, the family’s failure to choose was the reason for the disasters.

The only way to save them and the rest of the world was for the family to make their choice.

What I found inconsistent was that we were told the family had to choose together, but in the end it was more like one of them made a sacrifice against the will of the others.

2

IAmOriginalRose t1_jdqxm66 wrote

Hahahaa! Ok, I totes understand your need to distance yourself from buzzed (they’re not what they used to be!) and I’m glad you understood that I simply meant “popular pop culture media outlet”

Hey, blowback comes with the territory. You’ve got some fans that will support you, and that’s cool, too🫡

2

IAmOriginalRose t1_jdq7ipl wrote

Those things you mentioned are not directly comparable to the movie industry.

2 rings? Would that equate to? 2 Oscars? Some great actors don’t have any.

A flashy, popular actor is Tom Cruise. But is he a good actor? One of my faves is Ethan Hawke, who is less celebrated than Tom, but I believe he has buckets more talent.

(Watch BLACK PHONE - the man acts thru a mask, it’s wild!)

I guess people love Merryl Streep and she has quite a few awards, but she hasn’t really touched me personally, so there’s that. The fact that acting is about connecting with the audience and people are all so different we’ll have different reactions to different performances.

Unlike sport, which is quite technical with specific rules so it easy to see who’s better.

2