Better order a "Tab."

Wow, that shirt's like a dad polo combined with a Henley. Never seen that before.

Macbeth? Great Scot!

(Thank you, thank you, I'm here all week.)

At the very least she does seem highly insecure -- in all seriousness, possibly family-related and now drug-exacerbated. (I know I'm speculating.)

...The truth about a person tends to leave room for sympathy. But right now, all I can think about is her dodging responsibility for a felony and giving the public the middle finger. I wonder if we'll ever truly know why.

The page was full of answers meant to make her seem both very fascinating and yet relatable, and it all comes off as kind of weird instead.

(But part of that may just be hindsight.)

Or be involved with daily policy decisions affecting a quarter-million people.

...and this sub is absolutely right about that.

I think most people are targeting her (supposedly) extreme aging in connection with a suspected drinking and/or drug problem, by far the most probable explanation for her behavior from the hit-and-run although she has explicitly denied it.

...Some comments are simply being sexist, I guess, but that's hardly the thrust.

OP: Out of curiosity, what city/town was this? Even without many clues, the setup looks kinda familiar to me.

She hit him, regardless of fault (which was mostly his). But I specifically included the word "after" (the collision) because the important thing is that she fled. Honestly I can't wait to hear her explanation in court -- God knows she's had much longer than the average felony suspect to think one up.

...and he was right.

Because what he says "will happen" generally does not happen anywhere tried. Congestion on other streets tends to increase in the very short term, but habits change and volume decreases in the medium to long term.

Case in point: Amsterdam's gridlock literally looked like NYC's until it didn't. They made that change. And the traffic did not magically stay the same forever.

>Maybe instead of banning all cars you could do something that makes sense. Sterilization would be good for humanity.

Puts "reduce humans" above "reduce cars" -- so, outright putting cars before people. Got it.

Saved me a lot of time with that one.