Ilforte t1_jdpkqlz wrote

>If you define "developmentally plausible" as "100 million tokens"

Why would that be a disingenuous definition?

In general, your defense of generative linguistics is very weak. It's just invective and strawmen, and it reeks of desperation.

> overconfident doe-eyed futurists guzzling the silicon valley kool aid

Come on now.