Ilforte t1_jdpkqlz wrote on March 26, 2023 at 4:33 AM Reply to comment by sam__izdat in Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language [R] by No_Draft4778 >If you define "developmentally plausible" as "100 million tokens" Why would that be a disingenuous definition? In general, your defense of generative linguistics is very weak. It's just invective and strawmen, and it reeks of desperation. > overconfident doe-eyed futurists guzzling the silicon valley kool aid Come on now. Permalink Parent 3
Ilforte t1_jdpkqlz wrote
Reply to comment by sam__izdat in Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language [R] by No_Draft4778
>If you define "developmentally plausible" as "100 million tokens"
Why would that be a disingenuous definition?
In general, your defense of generative linguistics is very weak. It's just invective and strawmen, and it reeks of desperation.
> overconfident doe-eyed futurists guzzling the silicon valley kool aid
Come on now.