InfiniteState

InfiniteState t1_ivq9sbi wrote

Things like question 1 have been proposed a number of times and always lost. People don’t like to vote for raising taxes, even if they’re not affected. It was always going to be an uphill battle and I’m honestly surprised it passed.

Even with the huge amount of money spent ($31m!) and support from the teachers union and all of the Dem leaders (Warren, Healey, Wu, …) it was still really close.

6

InfiniteState t1_iuzloc2 wrote

That’s misleading because Saudi Aramco is cashing in on years of investing in extraction tech and infrastructure. That investment is why we’ve had cheap oil for the last 15 years.

They changed their thinking a few years ago and have decided, given the accelerated pace of the energy transition, to invest a lot less and take near term profits.

2

InfiniteState t1_iul6atk wrote

The article is about natural gas, not gasoline. Saving on gasoline won’t help us this winter.

It’s also not that dire. They’re talking about if we get a very cold winter and have severe shortages on imported natural gas, then we should be ready to take reasonable steps like suspending the Jones act to allow non-US ships to transport gas between US ports.

There’s no cause to reduce speed limits which would cripple Boston’s already terrible traffic.

18

InfiniteState t1_irbuagd wrote

Tax rates, per $1,000 of value:

| Cambridge | Boston | Brookline -- | -- | -- | -- Residential | $5.86 | $10.56 | $10.19 Commercial | $10.38 | $24.92 | $16.56

Does anyone know what the Cambridge rates are so low compared to neighboring cities? Is it because we have so much pharma and tech offices and labs?

4