Isiddiqui

Isiddiqui t1_j60bsv4 wrote

>They do this because their core business, running a TV network with ads is being squeezed out.

Exactly right. It's somewhat incredible people don't realize this and say just go back to licensing shows. What happens when there is no profit to be made in airing shows on cable/broadcast TV? They won't be able to make any money in just being studios for other streamers.

This move is in order to keep their businesses alive as the market is in the middle of a shift from fully cable to fully streaming.

8

Isiddiqui t1_itmqnoh wrote

Though one of the reasons they have so much cash is they don't randomly buy up companies. And at this point, they don't have too many options. I don't think they'd want to run a broadcast network (or deal with the increased scrutiny if they did), so Disney, Paramount, and Peacock are out. Maaaybe WBD, but they weren't really in play for Warner Brothers when AT&T wanted to get rid of it before.

1

Isiddiqui t1_itmoq4m wrote

MLS contract is a separate subscription service on the Apple TV app. Likely will cost $50-$100 a year. Season Ticket Holders (of which I am one) will get it for free.

https://www.mlssoccer.com/apple/

> Fans can get every live MLS match by subscribing to a new MLS streaming service, available exclusively through the Apple TV app

They'll throw a free game of the week on the Apple app and probably a few more on Apple TV+ but the entire thing is going to be on a separate subscription as well Sunday Ticket if they get it.

Want to try again?

16

Isiddiqui t1_itm0q5i wrote

>We introduced Apple TV+ at a very low price because we started with just a few shows and movies. Three years later, Apple TV+ is home to an extensive selection of award-winning and broadly acclaimed series, feature films, documentaries, and kids and family entertainment from the world’s most creative storytellers.

Seems like Apple fully intends to reach the prices of other streaming services once they get enough content that they can justify it.

Lots of folks were thinking Apple was going to keep the prices super low indefinitely as a loss leader, since they could easily absorb the cost. Guess not.

122