Uhhh no? The original comment is what the phrase is about.

Not sure how you managed to come to this conclusion.

Because of course the corporations are gonna be honest about their motives for invading privacy and basic human rights.

"speculation without evidence" is a really nice catch all to defend any and all corporations for their corruption, greed, and violation of rights.

Yes but then they wouldn't have an excuse to create Spyware for your messaging apps so they can send data of your messages to the highest advertising bidder (Not to mention to the government to help control voting patterns) and pretend it's about keeping you safe.

I got downvoted in r/android for pointing out what's actually going on here. Its amazing how much "intellectuals" on this site feel the need to pretend corporations are altruistic.

That's cause the entire article is just stuff everyone already knows and the whole purpose of this article is to make you view ads. Ya know, Iike every "article" on the internet nowadays.

Ahh. The ol “uhh. Hes racist/insert-popular-phobe-here” argument.

You people are so deluded into the infighting the corporations feed you so they can keep robbing us all. Wow.

So apparently if you criticize both corporate entities that pretend to be political parties, you’re now being “racist”? Do I have that right?

Shh. You’ll always be downvoted if you don’t follow the corporate propaganda of “its this team vs that team”!

Most of the “intelligent” people here are just as gullible as the red hatted idiots they think they’re so much smarter than.

The fact that a headline this blatantly false is getting upvotes should tell you all you need to know about redditors.