JanncorLennox
JanncorLennox t1_j2979ee wrote
Reply to comment by foreverinLOL in What are examples of american remakes being superior to the original? by Platanoes
This...
The US version absolutely has it's moments and I couldn't imagine any better casting to the Michael Scott role than Steve Carell, but the UK version is far better at delivering humor and emotion at a much darker level. Ricky Gervais is able to make me cringe at such a visceral level, and some of the scenes were just downright depressing.
US version = wholesome laughter.
UK version = dark laughter.
JanncorLennox t1_j24ycpb wrote
Knowing QT's style, it would be someone completely unexpected out of left fucking field. So cast my vote for that little Crazy 88 kid that Kiddo spanked and sent home.
JanncorLennox t1_j29xprd wrote
Reply to comment by hioo1 in Which "based on a true story" films butchered the true story the worst? by yoaver
The crew's dynamic in the disaster was slightly exaggerated for dramatic effect. In the movie there's a strange tension between Bill Paxton and Kevin Bacon which culminates into a shouting match trying with them at each other's throats. In real life they were completely calm and cool as cucumbers focusing on the task in hand and troubleshooting their dilemma.
Other than that small element, I actually admired the historical accuracy of this movie. The command module and lunar module were exact replicas of the real thing down to the actual switches and knobs and they accurately corresponded to the real "button presses" in several scenes when they are stirring their O2 tanks and resetting electrical transfer busses.