You're the one who is getting defensive.

I was ten years old in 1980 and I knew that smoking was bad for your health. At the age of 10 I knew not to smoke.

15 year old smoking. Oh, he's a smart one.

just look at all those snowflakes.

You would do well to take some of your own advice.

Look, I have not made any disparaging or personal attacks of anyone. So, let's just stop it with calling people babies and making judgments of who is insecure. I hope you have a good rest of your day.

Maybe you and your art teacher could use a thicker skin. The art world is not all fluff and cotton candy.

Besides, I was critiquing the art. It's not like I made personal attacks against the artist's character.

Save your bleeding heart for someone who cares. I can critieq how i wish.

Yes, it is apparent that the artist knows how to paint faces. I have seen their other works.

I stand by my opinion that this piece of art looks unfinished and by it's self it does look like the artist does not know how to paint a face.

Having faces on bodies is just a preference of mine. So, get off my back.

I am certain the artist left out the face on purpose. Still does not change my opinion that the art would be better given a face.

Scroll past if you don't like it? I don't think so. Art is there to be critiqued, positively and negatively.

Oh please put a face on it. The rest of the art is to nice to leave it so it looks unfinished or like your not capable of painting a face. Please.