KeckyOK

KeckyOK OP t1_j6b58o0 wrote

Ultimately, you need to eat this by holding it at the back with a napkin because in hindsight I didn't factor that the folded ham would create ham juice tunnels.

As great as it looks for texture, the practicality of this build doesn't work because heating it to melt the cheese makes this kind of messy unless you let it chill for a bit (congeal) before taking a bite and that defeats the point of a hot tasty sandwich.

But, I feel that folding three pieces of ham and layering them is a trick move that is way better than three flat slabs because it creates volume and texture.

edit: oh shit, I didn't think of layering them over each other and I put that third slice on top of the other two. It would have been 33% better if I had tucked them together so each piece of ham was both above and below its neighbours.

2

KeckyOK t1_iu4tg97 wrote

Twitter is just a repeat. He bought some stock, then moved up to purchasing the company and vacating its CEO position.

..and I guess he's like Edison too, while not robbing Nikola Tesla's inventions directly but pretty much using his name to give an EV company some 'sciency cred'.

The Nikola company tried to do the same thing with EV trucks, but that was just a scam from the very start.

39

KeckyOK t1_itb9sc2 wrote

by 'structure', they meant that you used no punctuation or made any attempt to differentiate who was speaking; rather, you've put both sides of the characters' dialogue on each line. Better example:

"Well, what did you have for breakfast last Tuesday, then?" asks the old man. His co-worker replies, "Porridge, I always eat porridge for breakfast."

"Well, I always heave my breakfast!" said the old man.

Also, once a dialogue is established you can then alternate without stating who is speaking.

"You heave your breakfast?" asks the co-worker.

"Yeah. I'm an old man."

"With a bad memory?"

"Shut the fuck up, Greg!"

0