You're confusing competency with skill and in so doing, confusing the issue.

Unions are no more evil nor repugnant than corporations. If we are to have one, we should have the other.

No, I don't.

Especially at a skilled job.

Yes.

One, single entity controls the profits of the teams working under them. The context clues in the previous sentence should lead you to the answer.

If the publishers are doing well, the studios who make the games that are their sole source of revenue should be doing equally well.

???

The first comment I replied to was trying to explain the price increase of games away by stating that the cost of game production had increased. I told you that that couldn't be the real reason because their profits have increased even more than their costs.

Now you seem to not understand how I could possibly think the 70 dollar price was just simple capitalist greed and nothing more.

Okay?

What the hell does that have to do with anything? Loads of Indie games make hefty profits because they aren't budgeted like a bloated, sprawling beached whales desperately trying to cling to life. If AAA companies can't make money ethically, then I say that means the Free Market dictates that they fail and make room for someone less out of touch with reality.

How's the boot taste?

And the revenue stream has increased ten fold.

The poor, multi-billion dollar video game companies are doing just fine, take a peak at their last 20 quarterly reports.

And the company makes even less. That's kind of the point, you big thicky boeboe.

Ah, another CEO who thinks their job is important.

We should definitely just take your word for it, no really guys.