KingToasty
KingToasty t1_j4uw4ml wrote
Reply to comment by Significant_Hold_910 in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Any of them. They're all former pieces of the Roman empire. There isn't any rulebook declaring what is and isn't authentically Roman.
KingToasty t1_j4dkc7z wrote
Reply to comment by akuthia in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
The line between norms/customs and legislation/policy is very thin in some parts of the UK government. Monarchs have tried to expand their own power and it isn't successful in history. Though yes, you could technically call it a theocracy now, though it impacts governance less than the term might imply.
KingToasty t1_iuhkded wrote
Reply to comment by Paltenburg in Human burial grounds and bullets from Spanish guns uncovered at site of last Mayan stronghold in Guatemala by GullyShotta
'Civilization" and "height" were bad choices of words by the article IMO. Maya is more of an ethnicity than a social structure.
KingToasty t1_j862pmi wrote
Reply to comment by Etzello in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
There's a gigantic organization. It has connections to natural resources, contacts with traders and political leaders, and has an armed force. There's an opportunity to get your family/clan/town/region access to those resources, people, and arms. That same opportunity is probably being offered to rivals.
Enthusiastic embrace is the most logical option in a lot of situations.