What the heck is an oink ball? That looks amazing, btw.

Seems like a lot of work and words for a bagel, but it looks damn tasty.

Both of those would have had more realistic violence and consequences. Man gets beat to a pulp with Batman's knuckle covers and barely looks like he has a broken nose? Come on now.

Ignoring the fact that the entire rating system, with no actual objective metrics, is a joke, I'm also sick of PG-13 being the industry standard for pretty much every movie. There isn't a single movie that's been released in the last 20 years that wouldn't have been better if they all shot for R ratings (yes, I know it's all about money).

I challenge anyone to name a movie that wasn't in some way hamstrung by the arbitrary rating system and companies aiming for a PG-13. Name a movie and I'll tell you how an R rating would have made it better.

Thank you for clarifying! I think the confusion was your use of 'messaging' when you were talking about character interaction/behavior.

It was? Because was you typed is the opposite of my point. You said it 50s dynamics wouldn't translate well and they'd try to update sociopolitical messaging... none of that says it's going to use 2022 gender dynamics. Maybe I misunderstood your meaning?

You're funny if you think they're going to use 1950s gender dynamics in this show.

What about when the rum's gone? Where's the rum gone...

High speed internet lines, much of the expanded power grid, additional roads, buildings, homes, etc. And that doesn't even consider the increased property value of the area. A home worth 80k in 1980 is selling for 480k today. Or do you think 1980 Miami is exactly the same as 2022 Miami?

You could give an example. That would be helpful and not reductive...

The answer is no. 90% of the infrastructure that exists today didn't exist in the 1980s. The frequency of storms is not increasing, but the amount of expensive shit in their path has increased exponentially.

Couldn't they also mean to say, "Don't let the negativity of that experience stop you from trying again?" I.E. using a negative experience for positive motivation?

Oh, no, I didn't make an error. Your many bullshit stories have proven that much to be true.

It says something about me? I wonder what that could be. It would be funny to hear what assumptions you've made about me given that statement you just made about how it's an error to do so.

Edit: So brave

>You act like those two statements are opposing ideas and can’t possibly both be true simultaneously

Actually, I used those two statements to make the point I did. That you're implying consistency.

>As I said before, you can believe what you want. My story is true whether you believe it or not.

You see, now I said at the beginning that your story is plausible, but that you've chosen to omit key elements in the story, like your part in it. Given that you've instead chosen to say, "nuh uh, we're as innocent as the driven snow" instead, I'll just stick to my original conclusion. Have a blessed day.

>Stop saying I’ve said things that I haven’t. You are using hyperbole to try and make it seem like I’m purposefully making unrealistic and exaggerated claims.

I used your own ridiculous story to make your story sound unrealistic, no hyperbole needed.

>I did not say my wife is constantly verbally abused. Merely that she has been verbally abused on more occasions than the average person because she’s small and quiet.

You're splitting hairs. You said she has a history of it, now you're saying it's more common than the average person. You can argue with my use of constant if you like, but the point is the same. You're full of it.

>Perhaps instead of getting all defensive, you should have gone with something like “Don’t lump all Padres fans together. We aren’t all bad!” unless you were just looking for a reason to argue.

Your idea for not being defensive is to say something defensive? I'd rather just keep calling your BS stories what they are, BS.

Why would I read a different conversation to get more context for THIS conversation? Especially when the additional context you've given ALSO sounds like bullshit? She does LITERALLY NOTHING, but is constantly randomly verbally accosted? Give me a break, man.

If you leave your house and run into an asshole, you've run into an asshole. If you leave your house and everyone you run into is an asshole, YOU'RE the asshole.

And you may not have outright said all fans, but you sure want to punish all Padres fans because "the ones you encountered" that day were assholes. Now, if a person wanted to levy a punishment to an entire group of people for the bad behavior of a few, what would that make the guy wanting to punish everyone?

You keep trying to apply some weird logic to other scenarios when in reality it's just your story that isn't believable. Is it possible? Sure, but you're saying every Padres fan is a piece of shit and I hope their team loses because of one very likely made-up incident.

That's even less plausible. This entire exchange happened in passing because he saw her sweatshirt? Not even "quietly cheering" now? Just happened by with an ice cream cookie and he's like, "Hey, cunt! You've got shit on your sweater!"?

I didn't say it doesn't exist, and I didn't say this event didn't happen. I just don't believe your, "I was just standing there" story. We're to believe that this belligerent fan just verbally assaulted your wife because you "quietly cheered" when your team scored? Come on now.

I've been a Padres fan since I was 6. I've been to quite number of games and while I've seen some shitty fan behavior on occasion, I've never seen what you're describing to a "quiet barely cheering" opposing fan. Your story reads like, "I've never done anything wrong in my life" and I don't believe you've told the whole story.