KrakenInAJar
KrakenInAJar t1_j5uwbp0 wrote
Reply to comment by Expensive-Track in [D] CVPR Reviews are out by banmeyoucoward
I think its one to five, but it is relativly arbitrary, the real confidence score is between the lines of the actual review. If a reviewer is inclined to change his mind it usually shows by the way the review is written.
KrakenInAJar t1_j5qfq74 wrote
Reply to comment by Extension_Ad7308 in [D] CVPR Reviews are out by banmeyoucoward
3 is borderline 4 is weak accept, yes
KrakenInAJar t1_j5q51at wrote
Reply to comment by silenac in [D] CVPR Reviews are out by banmeyoucoward
Common wisdom is to not bet on flipping, but it is a case by case thing and it can happen.
Read the reviews and if you can deliver a good, carefully worded rebuttal you may flip one or two. But in the end it depends on how open the reviewers are to flip.
KrakenInAJar t1_j5pvfuw wrote
Reply to [D] CVPR Reviews are out by banmeyoucoward
3 borderline (3), 1 weak accept (4), better than feared but I guess I will run on adrenaline for the next month...
KrakenInAJar t1_j9f7aq2 wrote
Reply to [D] Is there any AI model that predict stocks for the next minute? by SandraPlugged
The short answer is no.
I kind of have the feeling that these stock market system, especially those for extremely short time windows are the perpetuum mobile of the ML world. Everyone initially thinks it's a great idea (heck it's a money printer but ML) has a basic idea of how it could work, tries it and then fails.And there is an excellent reason why it fails. Short-term stock market data is probably the noisiest data you can get, which is a death sentence to any model that tries to work with it continuously and reliably.
STOP TRYING TO BUILD MONEY PRINTING MACHINES WITH ML IT IS NOT GONNA HAPPEN!