MammothPhilosophy192
MammothPhilosophy192 t1_j5zm7y9 wrote
Reply to comment by michalsrb in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser
> but human drawing is not that far from finding an image in a noise. If you start with empty paper, then refine it into sketch, then into colored image, then into more detailed image, etc. It's not that far off from refining image out of noise.
absolutely not, drawing is translating an idea into paper, it's not discovering what you want in the paper.
> It would eventually evolve into different artistic styles without humans
You were so close.... how many artistic styles do you know of? AI creations will be a style that will coexist with others, it won't replace a thing.
MammothPhilosophy192 t1_j5ynddy wrote
Reply to comment by GenoHuman in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser
As we move further into machine assisted living, pure human achievement will be lauded.
Also art is not only something pretty, art is recorded history through the eyes of men, art is a medium to express something, and when all is done, poems will be written of the downfall of men.
MammothPhilosophy192 t1_j5ym5ln wrote
Reply to comment by michalsrb in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser
> Sure, but you can say that about human artists too.
one thing is watching a chair, and drawing it, and another thing is trying to find something that resembles a chair in noise based on the perception of artists.. humans can and make art based on their perception on reality, there is no ai art without human artists, but there is art without ai.
MammothPhilosophy192 t1_j6hnow1 wrote
Reply to comment by DDoubleIntLong in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
Did you created the dataset it was trained on?