Bullshit article.

On the same note, Nicolas Cage films cause people to drown in pools, the US spending on science make people kill themselves and the more margarine Minnesotans eat, the more divorces they have.

Gender equality is important but it will not make people live longer as this title suggests.

> all the privileges

Ah yes. Like 80% of suicides, 99% of war related deaths, a lower life expectancy by several years, 92% of children ending up with their mothers after divorce, sexual harassment against men is being taken as a joke or even a favorable outcome, in quite a lot of countries men can't be raped in a legal sense because it's defined as forcefully inserting something in the other person's body, women's day being a celebration all over the world while men's day doesn't even warrant a doodle on the Google home page, quotas sometimes causing the selection of less talented women over more talented men, 2000+ centers for female SA victims with only a single one for men, women getting shorter sentences for the same crimes...

There is no doubt society is in many occasions uneven and unfair and that there still is a way to go. But don't pretend men have it all

This extra break absolutely makes sense but it's only fair if these off days will be deducted from the salary as well. But that leads us back to the "women earn less than men" issue.

I'm really glad you are doing these! Are you planning to check whether the most likely/medium option is a better strategy on the long run?

Yeah, that is correct based on the actual matches. For me it would make more sense to depict them as 1.10, 1.20 and that stuff but I guess it's not a general consensus.

How exactly does the 0.2 odds work?

His income is 92k, his cost of revenue is 73k and the difference is the profit basically. When you sell options, you get credit.

Buying options is quite risky as you figured, but selling options (what this dude is doing) is the other side of that trade: lower risk and lower reward, as well.

Which are written by some of the smartest people on the planet.

Ah, that's a great stat for some pub quiz. :D

I thought it's some goal difference shenanigan but that makes more sense. Chile tying with everyone, Italy beating everyone and Austria tying with Cameroon.

Great topic and interesting (but kind of expected) results, but I think you should use points instead of score. A match has a score but points are awarded for it.

Which team advanced with 3 points and when?

Had a stroke while reading the title.

Yeah. Roughly 70% of investment accounts are on the red. For every Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger, there are literally tens of millions of people who lost money trying to trade/invest.

That's the amount that he (his company, Berkshire Hathaway) received as dividend. But due to how the market works, if it wasn't paid as a dividend, it would have been realized in share price increase instead.

It still took quite a lot of good decisions to get where he is now.

I suppose Eberhard didn't have that much leverage after getting kicked out of the company that he founded.

Fun fact, these are Elon's thoughts about who should call themselves a co-founder:

> I believe that the title of founder is critically important and morally requires that you are physically engaged in doing the really hard founding work involved in the very important early founding months/years of the company. I wasn’t there and I didn’t do that hard work at/for Solar City, so it’s not ethical that I refer to myself as a Solar City Founder or co-Founder”.

Assuming the same applies to Tesla, Musk shouldn't call himself any kind of founder. Especially not without a physics degree.

Correction: Elon Musk is not the co-founder of Tesla.

> In a last minute twist [during the first fundraising period], he legally attacked the company and sued Eberhard, Tarpenning [the two actual Founders] and Tesla Motors Inc. Demanding that he be allowed to call himself a Founder.

Source

Edit: just realized that you probably visualized the same thing (Tesla being in the bought a start-up part and SpaceX being in the co-founded part). In that case, ignore what I said above.

> the UK controlled 40% of the world's surface

That's absurd. The British empire controlled some 23% of the world at its highest.