MassiveIndependence8
MassiveIndependence8 t1_jdla8px wrote
Reply to comment by H0lzm1ch3l in [D] I just realised: GPT-4 with image input can interpret any computer screen, any userinterface and any combination of them. by Balance-
Not all api are public and LLM aren’t fined tune to process api
MassiveIndependence8 t1_jdl9s3u wrote
Reply to comment by Single_Blueberry in [D] I just realised: GPT-4 with image input can interpret any computer screen, any userinterface and any combination of them. by Balance-
The problem is that it can’t do math and spatial reasoning that well
MassiveIndependence8 t1_jdl9oq9 wrote
Reply to comment by ThirdMover in [D] I just realised: GPT-4 with image input can interpret any computer screen, any userinterface and any combination of them. by Balance-
You’re actually suggesting putting every single frame into gpt-4? It’ll cost you a fortune after 5 seconds of running it. Plus the latency is super high, it might takes you an hour to process a “5 seconds” worth of images.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_jclqr7x wrote
Reply to comment by Floofyboy in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
Name one basic riddle that gpt 4 couldn’t solve.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_ja5vp50 wrote
Reply to comment by Momkiller781 in Weird feeling about AI, need find ig somebody has same feeling by polda604
Hahahahaha that’s so optimistic.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j6om6v8 wrote
Reply to comment by raylolSW in OpenAI has hired an army of contractors to make basic coding obsolete by Buck-Nasty
That’s not a good thing. If billions of workers won’t realize that they’re replaceable then it will hit them like a truck.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j65ylme wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
Oh yeah, I thought you were referring to the RL one. I didn’t think it was that important.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j65xqr9 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
Oh you mean the Minecraft model? Yeah I forgot about that one. That’s pretty huge too.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j65lann wrote
Reply to comment by throwaway_WeirdLease in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
AdA?
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j63y2wf wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
We had like 3 before this paper. I thought it was subsiding ngl.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4y8ugs wrote
Reply to comment by VictoryObvious6612 in How long until an AI is able to write a book? by Educational_Grab_473
👍
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4y8cww wrote
Reply to comment by VictoryObvious6612 in How long until an AI is able to write a book? by Educational_Grab_473
Lmao, sure bro RemindMe! 2 years
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4xyn0h wrote
Reply to comment by VictoryObvious6612 in How long until an AI is able to write a book? by Educational_Grab_473
That’s what the artist said
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4xy4xq wrote
Reply to comment by sideways in How long until an AI is able to write a book? by Educational_Grab_473
Can we see it? Is it posted anywhere?
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4xxrn3 wrote
Reply to comment by Kolinnor in What do you guys think of this concept- Integrated AI: High Level Brain? by Akimbo333
Atlas can pick up objects randomly placed.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3sttff wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Oh I am, you’re just too stupid to understand.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3stfka wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Here r/iamverysmart go back where you came from. You can throw some of your brainless pseudo-intellectual argument over there instead.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3sm248 wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Sure, I’M the one who’s willfully ignorant. Keep on living in your own bubble buddy, clearly no one agrees with you.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3sh5jl wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
> Aging also allows for us to exist.
Wrong
> You cannot exist without aging.
Wrong
> It's not the problem.
And wrong, nice try.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3sgcff wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Aging allows such vulnerability to take place. A person getting stabbed and you’re so adamant in removing the knife as opposed to the murderer. Aging is not like puberty, puberty is by design and aging is part of nature’s limitation. Playing the semantic game as opposed to looking at the functional relation between objects is just stupid. Whether we categorize it as a disease or not is not important, the fact remains that people are better off without it and it’s the shortest and the most straightforward solution to longevity. You’re not very bright are you.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3se15s wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Plenty
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j3m4l8h wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Puberty doesn’t cause death, aging does. That’s why it’s called a disease. You’re not very fast are you.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j26otok wrote
Reply to comment by AvgAIbot in An IBM Quantum Computer Will Soon Pass the 1,000-Qubit Mark | The Condor processor is just one quantum-computing advance slated for 2023 by nick7566
To train a model, it requires a lot and a lot of parallel computing, this means that each operation is very simple and disjoint from one another but the shear volume of computation needed is too expensive for the current hardware. Quantum computer can use superposition to concurrently compute every operations at the same time without needing any extra cores. This is extremely valueable as training will now only takes seconds as opposed to days and the cost will be around 10$ as opposed to thousands of dollars.
This is from my own understanding so it might be incorrect to some extent.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_izyl3lr wrote
Reply to comment by nitonitonii in Non-Invasive Laser Light Therapy Could Improve Short-Term Memory by Up to 25 Percent by greentea387
That’ll make your memory approximately 2.4 times better
MassiveIndependence8 t1_jdr6u2t wrote
Reply to comment by zero_for_effort in Why is maths so hard for LLMs? by RadioFreeAmerika
It takes GPT the same amount time to do anything, and since it’s impossible to multiple say “18837678995747 x 29747778847678877” in the same amount of time as “2 x 2” due to the fact that it’s more complicated, we can confidently say that GPT will never be able to do math since it means that every hard problems out there is as easy as the easy ones.