MoobooMagoo
MoobooMagoo t1_jalvray wrote
Reply to comment by lew_rong in In win for butterflies and loss for Texas Republicans, feds move to protect rare plant by Happy_Traveller_2023
I mean they wave around the confederate flag so I can't be too surprised that they're betraying their state.
MoobooMagoo t1_j8wda3i wrote
Reply to comment by AutoModerator in [WP] An Alien interrogator delves into a human mind to find out it’s secrets, and finds a large rusty locked door. The subconscious guards the door but doesn’t stop the interrogator from opening it. by The-Cannibal-Hermit
The alien slowly opens the door and hears a strange sound begin to float through the air.
"...helped thousands they'll help you too.
One lump sum of cash
They will pay to you.
If you get long term payments but you nee-" *SLAM*
The alien, fearing for their sanity slams the door shut and immediately decides that the human mind is just too dangerous to learn the secrets of.
MoobooMagoo t1_j7v8un6 wrote
Reply to comment by AlwaysAngryAndy in [WP] According to astronomy, wishes take thousands or even millions of years to arrive to the wishing stars. Today, wishes from people long past are starting to come true. by WorsCartoonist
All over the globe giant dead animals have been appearing out of thin air. Today two saber toothed cats suddenly appeared in downtown Boston. Yesterday a wooly mammoth was found just outside the Vatican. In Paris several weapons appeared that look to be large rocks affixed in some unknown way to the end of tree branches.
MoobooMagoo t1_j2o8766 wrote
Reply to comment by Koffeekage in Observer rats vocalize and show joy jumps when witnessing tickling. by [deleted]
Why else would anyone become a scientist?
MoobooMagoo t1_iyc0zud wrote
Reply to comment by DecentChanceOfLousy in ELI5 why we first multiply, then add by TheManNamedPeterPan
You're not wrong, but most of the confusion with order of operations happens at the multiplication -> addition level. At least in my experience. Like 5x^2 is really obvious what it's supposed to be to most people (if you're using actual super script, anyway).
Although that said, I understand that this very well may be because once you start doing more complicated math that actually requires a lot of parentheses and exponents and stuff you've already used the order of operations so many times it starts to become second nature, so it might just be that those are more obvious because the people that are encountering them are already well practiced.
MoobooMagoo t1_ix1efns wrote
Reply to comment by chubberbrother in Massive sinkhole threatens to swallow West Virginia police department by armsinsurance
Statistically it must mean God hates wife beaters, but I doubt the church will see it that way.
MoobooMagoo t1_isdcb94 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in 250lb Battlebot is flipped and sticks the landing by jon-in-tha-hood
This is a picture of that one up there next to people, so you can get a scale of how big they are:
MoobooMagoo t1_irjktt0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5
Oh ok I see what you're saying.
I still stand by my assertion that it should have been obvious that I meant hack the satellite through the company, because the alternative would be silly.
MoobooMagoo t1_irj6dhi wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5
"No you can't hack into the satellite directly, but the company is going to have an uplink somewhere and you can hack into that."
I don't know how much more clear I could have been.
MoobooMagoo t1_irinp56 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5
You think the government isn't made of ordinary humans?
Although I understand the point you're trying to make about resources. And yes it would be easier to hack the company, that's literally what I said. I'm not saying it would be easier to build your own satellite uplink and then hack the satellite directly. That'd be stupid. Who would do that? Why would you ever think that was what I meant? That's like if I said "I'm walking to the store" and you got bent out of shape telling me how hard it is to walk on your hands so walking to the store is a dumb idea.
You would obviously hack the company then use their own uplink to send your code to the satellite. And the detectability and traceability of the signal doesn't matter because it's just going to lead them back to the company's uplink.
MoobooMagoo t1_iril20c wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5
No you can't hack into the satellite directly, but the company is going to have an uplink somewhere and you can hack into that.
And the security of the satellite is going to depend on the company that owns and builds it. It's not like you can walk down to Satellites-R-Us and get some default model that comes with all sorts of security pre-installed. Some of them may very well have basic protections.
MoobooMagoo t1_irij1kc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5
So you think they're going to launch space ads that can't be updated in any way? We can get images back from Mars, I think we can get data signals to low orbit satellite ads.
Like here is a live video feed from the ISS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86YLFOog4GM
Well I think at this exact moment it's recorded footage. It can't broadcast 100% of the time but my point is there is no way any company is going to spend the money to send up just one, un-updatable ad.
Also, and this is probably way more relevant than my first link, people have already hacked satellites: https://www.freethink.com/space/decommissioned-satellite-hacking
MoobooMagoo t1_irggoeb wrote
Reply to comment by random8002 in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5
Or hack them. That'd probably be easier.
MoobooMagoo t1_jdtirfa wrote
Reply to Have deepfakes become so realistic that they can fool people into thinking they are genuine? by [deleted]
Probably.
Although I personally find it funny that this basically thrusts us back to the early days of the internet where no one ever trusted anything. Or at least you weren't supposed to trust anything. And people not trusting what they see / read on the internet is probably a net positive for the world.