Myotherside

Myotherside t1_ix3mbs3 wrote

Try peeling the onion just a little bit beyond what the article is presenting you. Question why it is being presented that way. Ask yourself what options are being ignored in that narrative and why.

Or just say “that’s what the article says” and expect that to be the end of the critical though required on the subject.

0

Myotherside t1_ix3le98 wrote

So you agree with me, but your phrasing was very partisan. Maybe drop the partisan language because you comment comes off as a partisan attack instead of being a serious comment.

Also LOL at the downvotes who think Dems are the answer to anything other than “the choice that isn’t R”

In your comment you also suggest that generation through non fossil fuel means is not possible, because if it was going to get done Dems would do it, which is absolutely laughable if you have anything beyond a surface-level understanding of politics.

1