agree that there's no reason to stop at drunk driving.

why is that? the deceased parent would have been able to afford a standard of living that is now unavailable? If you make the law unfair, you give arrogant nihilists something to feel the 'struck back' and 'did a good deed'

more people are saying 'fuck off i'm not changing my stance'

"losing" is presumptive and limited way to frame it. Fetterman went pro-fracing. And other conservative-shifts of the liberal overton window in PA

it's a major battleground state. people are going to leave up signage to maintain momentum for what they think is correct politiking. Pretending and begging otherwise is disconnected from reality

excellent x-over

it's an abbreviation of the word 'fracture'

especially with breeder reactors and related modern designs

i'm sure we'll start to do it again after the people that can profit on fracing are finished profiting on fracing

well i'll leave up my L. I forgot and thought it was all the tags, not just the plate

keeping those tags on your windshield for the old-skool creds

Does this mean we're getting to a point where parties will refuse to settle cashflows into state coffers, but act like fiduciaries for the money until the acting reps & administrators want to allocate / purpose it?

i'm not even sure that could work. I'm trying to liken it to how other countries have many parties in the governing body, and each has to barter to get things funded/etc. Same in this model — each of 'the two parties' is really a network of PACs and NGOs, with their own access to donations/financials.

Today those groups are already deciding where to allocate based on trust / alliances. Are we headed toward a model where they more like fiduciaries, trusting a lesser amount of political hierarchy?

(all of this is aside from what Cutler did, should do, or consequences)

please, analysis only. No partisan trope responses.

Anger Rover

Poe's Law

nah it's for crimes like this too.

if only there were a place he could be held, for a time, where he penitently reflects on the seriousness of the matter.

shallow search. predictable. someone who took the wormpill and wormed?

> I've been complaining about this for a couple decades, including and before the hanging chads. I'm anti-corruption, which sadly doesn't often give me the chance to plainly support any one party consistently.

It's not a good faith request. You don't deserve new time.

You'll have to go reading through my comment history to find where I've answered similar in the past.

I've been complaining about this for a couple decades, including and before the hanging chads. I'm anti-corruption, which sadly doesn't often give me the chance to plainly support any one party consistently. I'd need a military job if people want me to turn a blind eye to political corruption

You clearly are not a security professional, nor have ever been near the space.

I'm sure you already see that there would be a great many people that wouldn't have, or whose signatures could be so shakey that you could not be sure. Easier to fake if those were older people that have a known predisposition to lose motor skills due to geriatric diseases.

This security hole just writes itself. It's not hard. I've been complaining about these security issues for a long time, way before this election, and way before Bush's hanging-chads

You probably registered at some other time? That is not when my friend had to do upon moving.

also, the paper form, only asks for last-4 of the social, + DL number. That data is out there is some wants to buy it from the dark web. So that's how it's not secure enough, as compared to an in-person visit, or a live/video proof or credentials.

sounds like stinky threat-talk

if a real 'argument', it's a red herring regardless, as individual casualty does not risk the electoral process

None of that relates to the problem described. Stop and accept that reality is different.

It exemplifies how so many people have been confused on this issue.

I know someone that just moved into the state. They were sent a mail-in ballot registration. All they have to do is write their signature and send it back.

DL / SSN-last-4 are not trivial to get, but they're available to 'hackers.'

This is not security

People don't like to hear about risks because the reality and consequences of those risks means something they cannot cope with.

That's not how security works.

You're saying it's hard.

That's not security.

you're saying that the investigations that happened (could have missed some/many), that you heard of (ditto), did not report a problem.

That's not security