NotacreativeguyGM
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec5gtg wrote
Reply to comment by Umpteenth_zebra in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
There is material suitable for children. Stick to it. There is material not suitable for children. Don't use it
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec5azk wrote
Reply to comment by Umpteenth_zebra in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Are you saying since I care about my kids and other parents don't care about their kids, then fuck it, screw all the kids? I'm so lost on your logic.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec4xkz wrote
Reply to comment by Umpteenth_zebra in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Again. What are you talking about?
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec4g2i wrote
Reply to comment by Umpteenth_zebra in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
What are you talking about?
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec4dth wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_UR_XTRA_NIPS in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Here's a pro tip, I said keep all that, including religious materials out. The attack on education is saying keep the garbage out. Teach reading, writing, arithmetic. Don't teach gender ideology, race theory, religion or sexual orientation.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec40qg wrote
Reply to comment by Umpteenth_zebra in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
You're missing my point. I'm saying I don't care how people feel about these topics. Keep them away from my kid. I don't think they should show it to their kids either. But absolutely no way are they to expose my kids to it.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec35ke wrote
Reply to comment by Umpteenth_zebra in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
I don't think any parent should. But some people are pissed about graphic and pornographic material being banned. I'm saying if they want to damage their kid, that's their issue. Leave my kid alone.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec1v5b wrote
Reply to comment by Acidelephant in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
If that's banned, I have no idea why and would oppose it.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec1kfn wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_UR_XTRA_NIPS in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
No, it shouldn't be included. If you as a parent want to show your kids porn, snuff or religious materials, that's your prerogative. But that's the parent's decision. Get it out.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec1con wrote
Reply to comment by Ms-Anthrop in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Just read up on it... "Since it was first enacted in August, librarians and other educators have faced misdemeanor charges punishable by up to a year in jail or a $2,000 fine for giving students access to books the state has deemed sexually explicit. The Missouri law defined explicit sexual material as images “showing human masturbation, deviate sexual intercourse,” “sexual intercourse, direct physical stimulation of genitals, sadomasochistic abuse,” or showing human genitals." They aren't following the law, so they're shutting down funding
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jebzjwt wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_UR_XTRA_NIPS in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Doesn't matter the number. Get them out.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jebys2p wrote
Reply to comment by Ms-Anthrop in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
I'd recommend following up and looking into it yourself. News is more about agenda than news anymore. Both sides.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jebyl5j wrote
Reply to comment by Acidelephant in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Books about race theory. Not about black people. I don't know anything about the non-nuclear books. I'd be interested to see.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jeblqdx wrote
Reply to comment by schadenfreudender in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Taking about eating pussy and blowjob's seems pretty explicit to me.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jebl36m wrote
Reply to It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
It's odd people just hear someone say book ban and not look into it. They're taking sexually explicit books out of schools for 5-9 year olds.
NotacreativeguyGM t1_jec6tpt wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_UR_XTRA_NIPS in It is odd that some people support the right to bear arms, but reject the right to read books by schadenfreudender
Ok so it sounds like we agree on all fronts.