Numai_theOnlyOne t1_jefvcbb wrote on March 31, 2023 at 6:34 PM

Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79

I might be wrong but aren't there already two companies that claim to recover already 96+% ?

Numai_theOnlyOne t1_jeb9lah wrote on March 30, 2023 at 7:28 PM

Reply to comment by No_Character_8662 in Google Accused of Using ChatGPT Algorithms in Creating Its Neural Network by MINE_exchange

Tbh can we separate human learning with AI learning?

A human is a biological imperfect being that require time and repetition to learn.

AI needs just a large pool of data and can the same as millions of humans in a fracture of the time required.

I think that's not the same learning, and a thing that honestly should be questioned, after all our content was created with humans in mind and not meant to been used for ai.

Numai_theOnlyOne t1_jeb91dq wrote on March 30, 2023 at 7:25 PM

Reply to comment by YummyMummy2024 in Google Accused of Using ChatGPT Algorithms in Creating Its Neural Network by MINE_exchange

Yeah and it makes sense as human but I can see this being an issue with AI and how fast it can learn.

After all suddenly whatever I posted anywhere is used to generate revenue which was formerly targeted towards people for free to get response for free. AI though usually requires you to pay for it. So why shouldn't the pay me to use my data? Sure maybe there is someone that made money with my response, and I might buy any of there stuff that's fine because it was not only because of my input unlike AI which only works because of the data. Same with artists. They were posting stuff for free not to be used for free but to present their art and land a job. You can't also not just rip an image from the internet and use it in a commercial because "it was freely available on the internet".