October7_7

October7_7 t1_j2a3rd2 wrote

That doesn't change the current shortages of housing stock availability and quality, or rental vacancy. Population is a different statistic there bud.

You could ask me to clarify if you don't understand what I mean! Talking down to people is free!

Edit: Coward blocked me, can't stand the heat get off the subreddit.

1

October7_7 t1_j25ru7e wrote

Reply to comment by charons-voyage in Fast Lane by lucifyed

Don't care what speed you're going, if you're in the left lane and you're not actively passing get out of there! It's not a hard concept to understand.

6

October7_7 t1_j25loi6 wrote

Reply to comment by throwaway4pkmntcg in Fast Lane by lucifyed

You know you'll get a lot of hate for breaking road rules and inconveniencing your fellow motorists, yet you do it anyway. The irony of you telling other people to watch out for "Stupids who don't know how to drive" is practically absurd.

7

October7_7 t1_j25elyj wrote

Reply to Fast Lane by lucifyed

It's a passing lane you twit get the fuck out of it if you aren't actively passing fucks sake

4

October7_7 t1_j1yh3jl wrote

Oh got me with that one! Really blew my mind pointing out how a warehouse picker can't embezzle funds - really it's a shock seeing as they don't manage any money in a position with high turnover by design.

1

October7_7 t1_j1wlsvq wrote

You can say the same thing about the private sector dude, you got a source on that claim or are they only fake news when they disagree with you?

Glad to know I've taken up your mental space for the past five days though!

1

October7_7 t1_j19uxez wrote

You do realize that for a 501(c) nonprofit to exist they have to disclose their financials? Go to Charity Navigator, they'll let you know if the breakdown looks like shit or is reasonable. Quit fear mongering over non-profits when it only takes 3 clicks or so to find out anything you'd need to know.

6

October7_7 t1_ivq4ey6 wrote

Reply to comment by bagelman10 in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish

I didn't agree with everything he did, but it was clear he had the best interests of the people of Massachusetts in mind. He felt authentic and not just some party puppet. I'm honestly bummed he didn't run again.

1

October7_7 t1_ivq3hhx wrote

Reply to comment by BostonUH in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish

I have a hard time agreeing with you purely because Massachusetts and Vermont have consistently had very moderate, independent minded, and generally good moderate Republican governors.

It takes a minute or two to look at the policy individual candidates support. Elections happen every few years. It's not hard to apply critical thinking and not just act blindly party loyal.

5