Don't project your low-effort shame on me, sweetie. You're the one who made the initial pompous, unhelpful reply and then tried to deny responsibility for that flightless opinion. Put up or shut up. The onus is not on the audience here. If anyone's being "a dick", it's you, with your flaccid attempt at criticism like a park flasher with an innie.

edit: Uh hunh. Typical, child. Bark and run & hide.

"My criticism was on point and for some reason you got mad on behalf of OP and became defensive over absolutely nothing. I see you have nothing to say about my idea now that I've explained what could be improved. Try not taking everything as an attack and maybe take some time off the internet, as it seems even completely innocent comments come off as trolls to you, mr. crypto bro."

(nice alt u/_snowdrop_ )

You claim "it could be improved", but give no clue as to how and are also unwilling to show the quality of your obtuse opinion in an updated version shared with the thread here?

Troll.

How cute.

So, do it.

They're gonna talk shit anyhow. Fuck 'em.

Everything becomes lobster, on a long enough evolutionary timeline...

A couple things:

1. Have you seen Meet The Feebles, and

2. Muppet movies are not to be trusted by their titles.

I once was challenged to make a drinking game in college out of The Frog Prince, and chose "Drink when: the word "prince" is spoken; twice when they break into doing; and do a shot when a Muppet is thrown". Within five minutes the first musical number started, a spastic ditty about the frog prince wherein Muppets were launched for emphasis. By the end of that scene alone, we were down to less than half of the alcohol and two people were already tapping out. I don't remember if we continued the movie/game, but I doubt anyone there does. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Those new meth monks sure do go up with a quickness.

They're all a bunch of useless cunts, every single one of them from the ground up.

A completely free, uncertified, fully manual, and gruffly fumbling colonoscopy. Whee.

The simple assumption that "charitable causes" aren't corrupt AF and mismanaging donations (yes, even yours) is childishly naive, but the vitriol in the rest of this signage indicates a shitty mindset altogether.

FFS. Why does this sub suck ass at doing the ONE thing is supposed to?

Hey, guys! Pro-tip, y'all! Check it. Does your vacuum reek of dog? EMPTY THE FUCKING BAG, you sloppy git. 🤦🏼‍♂️

As a former competition archer, I completely concur. I clicked through to state precisely this.

Smart money's on 1-7 dying by grizzly, but I hear this #8 guy bought it in a car wreck. So, just plain grisly. 🤷🏼‍♂️

After all that, and he merely died a grisly death?

What project are you looking forward to using such in though, I'm curious

Not to be that guy, but it's my understanding that "ductility" is not the term for polymers, related to the difference between certain metallic crystal structures allowing plastic deformation (ductile) and the molecular breakage of thermoset polymers (i.e. not ductile), correct?

I'm also interested in this notion. 🤓🤙🏼

I believe you mean "academic" as the -ic does the work of the -al already, and has yet to reach the level of common parlance like redundancies such as "mythical", et al.

> Only antisemites are triggered by their ex dating a jew.

There, FTFY.

Going forward is all anyone can do. 🤙🏼

Are you the only one oblivious to your tone?

Ah, yes, the always appreciated uppity twat of an OP. 🙄🤦🏼‍♂️

Gee, I wonder what factors are at play when a result of inbreeding appears. Couldn't possibly be encroachment on/diminishment of the herd's territory or breeding YouTube, now could it?