Paulsar
Paulsar t1_itj7qtd wrote
Reply to comment by smatchimo in A stroll through Grand Park, Mt Rainier -- Washington, USA [OC] [3850x2567] by PNWShots
Who said you had to do that? I'm just saying for this example when it was called out from sometime familiar with the mountain.
Paulsar t1_itgpv5n wrote
Reply to comment by LordOfTheTorts in A stroll through Grand Park, Mt Rainier -- Washington, USA [OC] [3850x2567] by PNWShots
Completely agree. As a another simple check as well, if you Google "Mt Rainier Grand Park" you can see thousands of images with very similar looking size/aspect ratio and then compare to the OP and easily conclude it is stretched. If you have a hard time comparing visually, look directly at the angles of the side of the mountain profile.
Paulsar t1_itgpaar wrote
Reply to comment by dhoepp in A stroll through Grand Park, Mt Rainier -- Washington, USA [OC] [3850x2567] by PNWShots
I do a lot of photography. There is nothing you can do with your camera or lenses that would cause this. You realize the perspective and focal lengths are going to be almost identical in my example right?
Paulsar t1_itfntcf wrote
Reply to comment by jch1013 in A stroll through Grand Park, Mt Rainier -- Washington, USA [OC] [3850x2567] by PNWShots
You are very right. Luckily there are enough pictures from substantially the same perspective to easily confirm the image is manipulated.
Paulsar t1_j4jknnk wrote
Reply to comment by Br81 in The coastal mountains of British Columbia near Bella Coola [3500 x 2309] [OC] by Br81
Some of the best photos I've ever seen.