>You don't change your number if your phone gets hacked.

This

You don't change your ISP if your pc gets hacked.

If your phone gets "hacked" (IE a virus etc) the phone gets wiped.

It's an important distinction because one is not clicking dodgy links and cyber health, the other is making sure you think before you hand over bank details. Being scammed isn't "shes stupid" it's "she was caught off guard, or without knowledge to defend against the scam"

The change of number is usually because when one person falls victim to a scam the number is passed around because they're more likely to get scammed again without the extra knowledge.

Looking at the search https://www.reddit.com/r/tifu/comments/1086fxg/tifu_by_potentially_getting_my_nudes_exposed/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button was the last one, but yeah this seems to have a post weekly

Edit I think this one is slightly later https://www.reddit.com/r/tifu/comments/1082gn5/tifu_i_sent_nudes_to_someone_on_snapchat_and_they/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Seems to be one of these posts a week these days...

>visitation

Not an issue I'm the UK, non married have the same visitation rights in all hospitals

>decision making that would otherwise have to be proactively dealt with

I agree with this point, however "get married because then you don't have to fill out as many forms" seems to be a reason that falls flat for me why it would be a reason to "run away"

>the uk gives a swath of beneficiary and medical benefits for being married.

Oh really? Because the only "medical benefit" is implied next of kin.

For beneficiary only non shared assets are subject to inheritance tax when one spouse predeceases the other. Non-shared assets can also be held in trust for minors.

The uk literally has alternative options for EVERY marriage benefit except married tax allowance, where £1250 of the tax allowance can be transferred, but only if you're a basic rate payer, meaning that only if one partner is earning under £12500 pre tax a year and the other under £50000 you can get up to £250.

>since tax benefits were introduced for married couples with children.

Oh really? I'm in the UK and we have (almost) no tax benefits for marriage (£200 a year subject to very specific circumstances), almost every EU member state has no marriage benefit.

>while subject to a government that provides huge amount of legal benefits

So in the USA?

>Is that really your argument?

Is YOUR argument really "But 'murica gives us benefits for it"

Perhaps the real LPT should be "If you're in a place that give benefits for being married, discuss the benefits of marriage with your significant other, and if not being married is a deal breaker, don't invest in a relationship with that person" but I guess it's not quite as catchy as bashing men for not agreeing with your opinion...

The title literally says "If he is willing to make a baby with you, but unwilling [sic] to get married, RUN. RUN LIKE HELL."

Not sure how "unwilling" means I'm missing context but okay.

Seems like it's a "No marriage is a dealbreaker for me, it should be a dealbreaker for everyone" post.

So anyone who is non-religious and doesn't want to marry due to that shouldn't have a child...I see

Especially when ctrl+enter sends, I've had more than one colleague send a half finished email because they managed to hit ctrl...

For outlook it depends on receivers policy as well, otherwise they get a request to recall; which makes them look closer at the email, best way is to add a 2min+ delay on all outbound emails (known as the career saver) so you can delete it when you accidently send.